Thursday, December 31, 2009

happy new year 2010: voices carry

Well, 2009, we hardly knew ya!

For many of us, the year that began much the same as any other became one that was slightly more eventful than we anticipated. Millions of Americans lost their jobs and now live a daily struggle to support their families and keep their homes. Our military continues battling to keep us safe in the face of increasing terrorist threats. And, still, as we come to the end of the year, the difficult times seem certain to continue for the foreseeable future.

In the face of all this, though, I can't help but look back on 2009 as a year of great awakening in our country!

More Americans began paying more attention to our government, and the Tea Party movement found its cause and its voice as proponents of common sense solutions to the issues of the day. And, as this grassroots effort gained momentum, they found that they had some notable individuals willing to join them. From Jim Demint and Tom Coburn, to Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin, these national leaders gave disenchanted citizens motivation and encouragement to continue to speak out as participants in our republican system.

With 2009 drawing to a close, the voices of the people are as strong as ever. We are engaged, we are informed, and we plan to vote!

We are poised to ring in a new year with the all the hope, excitement, and uncertainty that always seems to accompany this festive occasion. Looking toward 2010, we should be encouraged by what we have seen this past year.

I know that the resilient American spirit, embodied in all of us, will lead to monumental events in the coming months: the public debates that have defined the political landscape will go on; and the challenging economic times will lead to innovation and ingenuity as ordinary people seek new opportunities to provide for themselves and contribute to their communities.

Thankfully, no matter what I presume to know each year as December 31st becomes January 1st, the only thing that is certain to happen is that the new year will bear little resemblance to what I had in mind. So, my pledge for this new year is to continue to do my part as a responsible citizen by living out the Providential plan set before me - whatever it may be.

And, finally, as the end of the year seems to be the time for poignant quotes, I will end with what I think is my favorite of 2009. For me, it captures the events of the last twelve months in the simple and succinct manner that is the trademark of its author, and it is taken from the final page of Governor Sarah Palin's biography, Going Rogue:

By His grace, an American life is an extraordinary life.”

**********************************************************************************

Happy New Year, fellow Patriots - many blessings to you in 2010! Make it count!

Follow me on Twitter
Read my blog - thedesignconservative.com
read more...

2010: The Year Conservatism Reigns: A Post by Conservative Girl with a Voice



Wow, what a year 2009 has been! I'm sure I don't have to tell you how much our country has changed within the past year. Like many of you, I look to 2010 with the hopes that conservatism will prevail. I guarantee this year's mid-term elections are going to be a big indicator of just how big of an impact the conservative movement is going to have on our country, and let me tell you something, the tea parties and town hall meetings are just the beginning. In 2010, I have a feeling the so-called "tea party movement" is only going to get stronger. This movement has the power to transform our country back to the days of fiscal conservatism, fiscal restraint. I couldn't be prouder of the everyday men and women who have decided enough is enough and are now taking a stand, and I say "Thank you to you all; keep up all the hard work. We ARE being heard!!!" Continue to stand up, and continue to speak out. Don't let the left define you as simply an "angry mob." We are not a mob, but; instead, we are a conservative army!

My life has changed a lot within the last year. Last year at this time, I definitely did not see myself where I am today. Over the course of a year, I started a blog, became the San Diego Regional Organizer for the 2012 Draft Sarah Committee and a political analyst for various radio shows. I want to thank Eddie Burke of Alaska's 700 KBYR, Jason and Phil of Orlando's 660 WORL Tea Party Radio, April Liesel of Pro-Sarah Radio, and Martha Cano of Join Team Sarah Radio for giving me the opportunity to stand up and speak out in the name of conservatism. I couldn't be more excited for the doors the good Lord has opened for me. Never in my wildest dreams did I see myself looking at politics as a career. Last year, if anyone would have told me that, I definitely would have said "That's crazy!" Now, I thrive on politics. Many of you will think I'm some nerdy girl when I tell you how much politics excites me, and I don't blame you because, to be honest, I probably would have thought that a year ago too.

I have had the pleasure of getting to know so many people. As I have mentioned before, I will forever be grateful to Sarah Palin for bringing us all together. Sarah is an amazing woman who I believe is the future of America. She has the intellect, charisma, poise and sheer grit and determination to get the job done. A year ago, I never thought I would have the chance to meet her and her family. I am so excited I had the distinct pleasure of meeting them earlier this month in Reno, Nevada. It has been my pleasure to spread her commonsense message and to report the truth, which is something the msm are not doing. I am not alone, for there are several members of Sarah's Army out there. We will continue to support her and her entire family.

And last, but certainly not least, I want to thank you all for taking the time to read my blog; it means so much to me!!! You all are great Americans, and I will forever be grateful to you all for your kind words of support and encouragement!!! Again, thank you all. I want to wish you and your family a very prosperous New Year. God bless you and yours, and continue to keep up the good fight fellow patriots.

NOTE: I WANT TO GIVE A BIG SHOUT OUT TO TEXAS 4 PALIN FOR AWARDING MY BLOG THE "BEST NEW BLOG OF 2009" AWARD!!! I AM HONORED AND HUMBLED FOR THIS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT! THANK YOU SO MUCH, GOD BLESS!!! CLICK HERE TO READ ABOUT THE AWARDS!!!

(Click here to visit Conservative Girl with a Voice and become a follower. Click here to follow me on Twitter.)
read more...

Wake Up Black America: Hell Has Frozen Over

By Adrienne Ross - www.motivationtruth.com

Wake Up Black America reports that MSNBC's Ed Schultz conferred upon Governor Palin his "Eddy Award" for 2009. An honor? I'll leave that to you to decide.

Nonetheless, Tyrone writes:

Welcome to the Twilight Zone! I'm not disagreeing with Ed Schultz at all in him giving Sarah Palin his "Eddy Award" for 2009, because he's actually right for once. I just never thought he would give credit to his and other liberal's most sworn enemy since George W Bush times two. I'm going to break this down to what it really means. The left has tried to label Sarah Palin as being the dumbest most clueless woman to ever step onto the national political stage. It all started last year and has just snowballed out of control ever since. What Ed Schultz said is very realizing, and he unknowingly contradicted the claims of his fellow Palin hating liberals. The day after the election, I stated that Sarah Palin wants to run for president in 2012. I stated the biggest obstacle to her running would be her serving out her first term as the governor of Alaska. For those of you who don't know why Palin serving out her first term would be a problem for a presidential run, here's the reason why. If Sarah Palin would have served out her first term to completion and not decide to run for a second term, she would have left office January 22 2011. The Iowa Caucus is I believe January 3rd 2012. Sarah would have had less then a year to organize a national campaign basically from scratch as well as set up a support staff in Iowa and other states. When liberal 527 groups filed 19 frivolous ethic violation complaints against Palin, I believe it provided Sarah a way out of being governor in order to focus on a presidential run without being obvious to that reason.

I disagree with Tyrone that Governor Palin was plotting for 2012 when she made the decision to leave the Governor's office, for I believe she left for precisely the reasons she stated. However, I agree vehemently with his suggestion that the stupidest thing the Left ever did was to confuse their own stupidity with hers. Perhaps Tyrone is correct and the people Schultz surrounds himself with are getting a clue also. Even so, I have no doubt that they wish their first assessment of Governor Palin had been accurate--or at least they will by the time she's through.

Ed Schultz might be a liberal kook, but he's not completely dumb, and he knows what any self professed politically astute person knows. Take emotion pro or con out of the equation when it comes to Sarah Palin. Her book tour allowed her to plant the seeds for a presidential run. In several polls, Sarah Palin is practically tied with Barack Obama. She has managed to repair the damage in her likability among independent voters that the media helped to cause last year. She has solidified her base as Ed factually stated. Her Political Action Committee is racking in money left and right. Palin even promoted Sarah PAC on her tour bus. Tell me again this woman is stupid.

[...]

I'm sure as the new year approaches, Ed Schultz will bring out the knives yet again against Palin. One thing is certain. As liberals, political pundits and the media are figuring out, they might hate Sarah Palin's guts, but they know they aren't dealing with some clueless "Caribou Barbie" as they wish they were.

The truth is no one knows what 2012 holds for Governor Palin, but the article is an interesting one. Read it in its entirety here.
read more...

God Don't Like Ugly; Calling Out Craig Medred

By Adrienne Ross - www.motivationtruth.com

There's an old expression that goes like this: "God don't like ugly." I could not count the times I heard that growing up. It was used as a rebuke by the adults in my life whenever I did something they deemed inappropriate. As I got older, and made wiser choices, the need to be reminded of this "truth" diminished. However, not everyone grows up and makes wiser choices.

Exhibit A: Alaska reporter, Craig Medred

Medred's fascination with discrediting the Palin family is...well, ugly. What's it this time? Well, this time he fancies himself a Going Rogue fact-checker, and in that he's in bad company already. However, Medred clearly isn't capable of checking anything because he can't get his facts straight. For this, he gets called out.

Mel Bryant, my colleague over at Conservatives4Palin, points this out in an article called "Truth in Reporting." Bryant exposes, not only Medred's ridiculous preoccupation with "checking on" Governor Palin, but also his gross inability to do so with any success.

Bryant writes:

Now, Jeff Smith, author of Alias Soapy Smith: The Life and Death of a Scoundrel, is a bit annoyed with Medred. You may recall that Governor Palin mentioned a man named "Soapy" Smith in her book as part of a larger passage about the history of Alaska and some of its characters. The paragraph in Going Rogue that mentions "Soapy" says:

After his adventures in Tombstone, the legendary lawman Wyatt Earp came north and spent a few years in Nome during the gold rush. On the other side of the law was "Soapy" Smith, a Wild West crime boss whose tight-knit gang moved from Colorado to Skagway. They made a mint cheating gold miners out of their cash. It finally caught up with Soapy Smith: he was killed in a shoot-out with a vigilante gang.

As part of a larger piece at Alaska Dispatch, Medred fact checked this paragraph. In this check, Medred said that the historical record states that "Soapy" was not killed in a shoot-out with a gang, but was instead killed in a scuffle that turned into a gunfight with a man named Frank Reid. Reid, he said, shot "Soapy". Among others, he cited a passage from Jeff Smith's book to bolster this version of events. According to Smith, however, Medred was off base.

Smith said (addressing Medred):

My name is Jeff Smith, author of Alias Soapy Smith: The life and Death of a Scoundrel and the website Alias Soapy Smith. It is important to me that people know that you took the facts from my book and my website completely out of context and horribly and incorrectly stated my conclusions about the Shootout on Juneau Wharf in which my great-grandfather, Jefferson Randolph "Soapy" Smith was killed. I can only surmise that you either did not read the book and/or website or that you intentionally left out major important portions of one or both in order to show that Sarah Palin was incorrect in her statements on page 13 regarding Soapy Smith's fight with vigilantes.

Had you read the book and/or my website you would have clearly noted in my book (pages 532-580) and on my website (HERE) that Frank Reid was NOT the man who killed my great grandfather, and that in fact, another member of the vigilante guards present joined in the fight and wrestled Soapy's rifle away from him and turned it on an unarmed Soapy and shot him in the chest killing him instantly. Whether you agreed or disagreed with Soapy's ways is irrelevant to the fact that Soapy was shot while wounded and unarmed, which in most civilized communities is murder. The vigilantes hid this fact from the courts in order to save their own new found power.

Smith attempted to get a correction from Medred who eventually rewrote the article, removing the citation for Smith's book. Medred also issued a clarification citing Catherine Holder Spudes. Smith isn't particularly impressed with Medred's clarification:

Mr. Medred's "clarification" is filled with errors but truth in history is not his goal. Disproving Sarah Palin's book is his goal.

Read the full C4P article here.
read more...

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Sarah Palin, PJTV Person of the Decade Discussion - Video

By Adrienne Ross - www.motivationtruth.com


On PJTV's "Trifecta," Governor Sarah Palin is discussed as, not Person of the Year, but Person of the Decade. A point made is that one cannot mention Palin without talking about her potential to be President of the United States. Add to that her history of walking the walk by living out the values she proclaims, rather than simply blowing hot air, and you have a rather interesting conversation.

Click here to watch the video.

(h/t Damian - C4P)
read more...

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

UPDATE: Christmas Friendship Dinner HUGE Success: A Post by Conservative Girl with a Voice


I hope you all had a very Merry Christmas and are looking forward to the new year that is rapidly approaching us. As I am off of work this week, I have been taking it easy, but I did want to post an update to a story I reported on a couple times within the last couple months: Wasilla's Christmas Friendship Dinner. This year's dinner was a huge success thanks to hundreds of Alaskans and many in the lower 48 who donated their time and money to making this year's dinner possible. As my regular readers know, Tracey Porreca was among those awesome individuals who helped to make this event a success. You all need to visit Tracey's great blog, Finding Myself in Alaska. Tracey did a great job blogging about the event and including many touching photos. I have included part of her post below for you to read. Click on the sample to read the rest and to see all the amazing photos Tracey took.

The Christmas Friendship Dinner in Wasilla was a huge success!

Friday, December 25, 2009

I sit here in amazement at what a wonderful event it was that just took place. The Christmas Friendship Dinner held in Wasilla, Alaska is truly unique. I've never seen an event of this size headed up by a group of caring citizens, and not a major organization. They all know what needs to happen, and they get it done. I feel so blessed to have had the opportunity to work with members of this group that have been doing this for years. I want to say this to them, and to anyone reading this so you all will know, that this is what makes our community so wonderfully special. I send blessings to all my local friends, and to all those whom I've met through the internet this year. Below is a copy of an article from The Frontiersman,our local valley newspaper. My only comment would be that the writer is not quite correct - our celebration was not about Sarah as he said, but it's not about Santa either, as the article suggests. The celebration of CHRISTmas is about CHRIST. After all, he is the reason for the season! Please take the opportunity to look over these photos, as well as the attached article. God bless everyone, and Merry Christmas!

(Photo courtesy Tracey's blog. Click here to visit Conservative Girl with a Voice and become a follower. Click here to follow Tracey on Twitter. Click here to follow me on Twitter.)
read more...

Monday, December 28, 2009

I guess we won't be seeing Tori Amos at any Tea Parties anytime soon

Courtesy Contact Music through Fox Nation:

Add Tori Amos to the list of celebrities who think they're smarter than Sarah Palin without anything to justify that belief.  Says Ms. Amos, should Mrs. Palin choose to run for office again, then she will run against the former governor.  Quoth Ms. Amos:

If Palin runs again, I'm going to run on a Republican ticket. What I know about Middle Eastern policy could fit on a thumbnail, but I still know more than she does. You have to ask, how could a nation nearly vote in somebody who isn't qualified for the job?

Like I said, Ms. Amos offers no proof to her assertions, but given that Governor Palin has been to the Middle East at least twice and has made numerous statements about events ongoing there, and given that, to the best of my knowledge, Ms. Amos has no qualifications to talk about Middle East policy, it certainly appears to me that Tori Amos is yet another celebrity who is compelled to made statements she can't back up simply because she hates Sarah Palin.


Plus, her chances of winning on a Republican ticket are roughly the same as my chances of winning six gold medals in Vancouver.

(Cross-posted over at my blog, Snowed In.  Come on by.)
read more...

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Bristol and Tripp; Wisdom Beyond Years

By Adrienne Ross - www.motivationtruth.com

On December 27, 2008, Bristol Palin's son, Tripp, was born. Happy Birthday! One year later, he is as loved as he was then.

A few days after the birth of her first grandson, Governor Palin's office issued a statement. It reads in part:

"We are over the moon with the arrival of this healthy, beautiful baby,” Governor Palin said.

[...]

Isn’t it just like God to turn those circumstances into such an amazing, joyful blessing when you ask Him to help you through?”

Bristol Palin said she “obviously discourages” teen pregnancy and knows that plans she previously made for herself will now forever be changed. “Teenagers need to prevent pregnancy to begin with – this isn’t ideal. But I’m fortunate to have a supportive family which is dealing with this together. Tripp is so perfectly precious; we love him with all our hearts. I can’t imagine life without him now.”

Tripp has been nurtured and loved by his mom, grandmother, aunts, uncles, and a host of other relatives and friends. His story speaks to the power of love and responsibility. The care and support that Bristol has been able to give her baby boy is a direct result of the love she has received from those closest to her.

Bristol didn't believe the lie that she couldn't persevere, choose life, and finish her education. Instead, she embraced the truth. No doubt, she knew she had a mother who was on her knees asking for God's help. And that's the way it should be. She looked to her left and to her right, too, and saw a myriad of other family members alongside her. And that's the way it should be also.

I remember reading the Governor's statement a year ago. When she asked the question

"Isn’t it just like God to turn those circumstances into such an amazing, joyful blessing when you ask Him to help you through?”

I couldn't help but enthusiastically exclaim, "Yes it is--just like God."

Thank God for people like the Palins who inspire their children to embrace their own children with open arms, even when life takes you by surprise.

I have personally seen the love Bristol has for her son. I have attached two pictures of mother and son below that I took in Wasilla, Alaska in July.

Bristol, thank God for your strength and courage in choosing life, faith, and responsibility. You have demonstrated--even in your youth--a wisdom so needed in this world. God bless you and your son. The best is yet to come.



read more...

Saturday, December 26, 2009

More Explanations of The Palin Factor Today

I'm still in awe over the whole Sarah Palin factor in the world today. Don't get me wrong, because I definitely like her and all, but that would be the norm from a simple person such as myself. I thought up until now that I had seen it all though when it came to political hate with the Bush years, and I am quickly learning that I ain't seen nothing yet. This started of course a little over a year ago, when the Mainstream media was attacking her stupidity, and lack of skills, and it didn't pass the smell test. I'll be the first to admit that if MSNBC tells me something I hit the Internet to see what the truth is, but it was really over the top since all the people attacking her were justifying a man who never completed a full term of Senator at any level. That same man hadn't held a job other than community organizer, or professor, as well, and I could smell a little indoctrination.

Now I'm not charging out of the gates to endorse Sarah Palin, but I am using this as an example of how the average person out there might. When a lot of Americans saw the only person on a ballot with Executive experience being attacked as hard as she was, it makes some people like myself think that there has got to be something to her. Obama, Biden, and McCain had no Executive experience and were all treated better. Palin by example had been both a Mayor and a Governor. Being a Senator is a world of different, and those that knew that immediately started taking notice. Then there were the second round that started taking notice based on "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" theory that applied to me when I noted the MSM bias. The third round is what we are seeing now, and that is the "even the most ignorant can see what piling on looks like" and they are trying to learn more about her.

I think the most interesting person I found explaining the great values of Sarah Palin lately was one of the loudest of Obama supporters in the last election. He also happens to be a black man that I work with, who told me that after he read a book review in the local paper, bought Sarah Palin's book and became immediately hooked on it. He had it read in the entire weekend, and even used the word "charming" when explaining it to me. The interesting part of it all was that before that he had been spewing the venom that MSNBC and CNN had told him to, but that book review had turned him around pretty fast. Why you may ask? From his own mouth it was "A review on what the reviewer hated about Palin personally with a few quotes to back it up" and he couldn't stress enough how obvious it was.

Now aside from the fact that I was pretty proud of him for doing all this on his own I was even more proud of Sarah Palin in all of this. Seriously, I don't think the average person realizes how difficult it is to have the amount of hate thrown at them that the average politician does. To be a pro-life woman puts you on a whole different plain of hate that is reserved for "traitors to the cause" that they get labeled as. This goes the same for right wing black men and women, but it especially hits a serious crescendo for women in general that have a conservative viewpoint. The bullies in the media always attack conservative women with things that have nothing to do with anything. They go after the way the woman looks, the way they act or talk, and most importantly, they go after everyone around them. I'm sure the Levi Johnston factor has a lot to do with Sarah Palin's popularity these days, as we are talking about a man that has done nothing in this world aside from impregnate her daughter. Throwing him around as nothing more than an "irrelevant humiliation factor" has got to be throwing the independent thinkers towards her more and more every day.

Then there was that attack by Norah O'Donnell at the Palin book signing. Sure some people can laugh because a 17 year old girl didn't know everything about Sarah Palin, but a lot of people didn't. Common sense and a very active right wing radio, pointed out that Norah and her note cards was prepared to go "git" someone. The fact that she chose a 17 year old girl looked like bullying, and again it was the typical norm that you see whenever an MSM reporter and Sarah Palin are involved. I heard a lot of comments from people that normal I would have put in the "uninformed" column about Norah the day after that happened and they weren't pretty, especially when they compared her to David Letterman. Simply sitting back and watching all of the backlash that the MSM is creating upon themselves in regards to Sarah Palin, is a lot more entertaining that listening to Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck or Mark Levin, do their schtick on the whole affair. On that note, I am starting to hear more and more of the people that "didn't care" talking about those radio shows, that I can guarantee you they didn't care about until lately. When I heard one of the Dominicans that I work with quoting Fox News, I knew that it was starting to get serious.

People can only put up with "mind numb robot" syndrome so long. I can even defend some of the things that MSM would say about many of the alternative news sources. There isn't a day that goes by when I don't want to strangle Sean Vanity when my grandmother leaves the station on in my car after she borrows it. The guy gets on my nerves something fierce, but on the other hand, he says a lot of things that other people want to hear and they aren't going to get it by turning on MSNBC. It doesn't make them stupid. It doesn't make them indoctrinated, and worse than that I'm pretty sure that it makes more than a few turn on just to see how stupid all those "mind numb robots" are and never stop listening. In the theater of ideas, you win more battles with ideas, than with insults. Trust me on that one because I always shut off anyone who attacks me on a personal level unrelated to the argument at hand. As idiotic as I think the other side on most arguments may be, I can assume that they do the exact same thing when I use terms like "commie" or "moonbat" or something else that is purely insulting and don't add to the argument. What I don't understand is why I figured this out, and I am far from professional, and those that are professional have not and probably never will?

One of the greatest days of my life was when I met Paul Tsongas. I was a Republican and he was a Democrat. I changed my voting status, just so that I could vote for him in the New Hampshire primary, because he was engaging, and had logic that I really appreciated. In the end he won the New Hampshire primary later to lose to Bill Clinton. When I met Bill Clinton {the week before I met Paul Tsongas} I actually felt like I had met the "Masked Jackal" and his dis ingenuousness slid down my hand after he shook it. I voted Libertarian for the first and last time after that general election, but I remember that year with political fascination because I had learned that potentially I had pretty good instincts. I try to stay well informed, and I {as I said earlier} take the MSM lead to go and learn what they aren't telling me. I think in the case of Sarah Palin, and the frustration many feel with Barack Obama, there are a lot more people out there following the lead of people like me, that are out there looking things up. For better or for worse it could possibly make a better America, if we make it that far ;8o)

Other Crap This Weirdo Publishes... Mental Notes & Random Musings {Daily Blog} The Crow's Nest {The Homepage of Jeremy Crow .. Not Always PG .. Be Warned}

All writings Copyright © 2009 .. The Crow's Nest & Anyplace Else That Lets Me Post It

read more...

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Merry Christmas Wish: A Post by Conservative Girl with a Voice



I just wanted to take a minute to wish you and yours a very, very Merry Christmas. I know many of you are very busy with planning today and tomorrow's festivities, but remember to stop and take a minute to reflect on the true meaning of the season: Jesus. He is the light and the hope of the world!!! I am so thankful to have been brought up in a family in which I was reminded of this each and every day of the year, and most importantly at Christmastime when we celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ.

Let us all be thankful for everything we have as a nation. I love our military, and I am so grateful for the sacrifices our brave men and women make for us each and every day of the year! I have included a link to a Youtube video that will put everything into perspective. Click here to watch!!! Enjoy and MERRY CHRISTMAS TO YOU AND YOURS!!!


On a cool side note, below is a photo I was presently surprised to find on the internet yesterday of Sarah's awesome dad, Chuck Heath. He is pictured at the Wasilla book signing, wearing one of the red Going Rogue Book Tour 2009 shirts we embroidered Sarah's family. How cool is that?



(Click here to visit Conservative Girl with a Voice and become a follower. Click here to follow me on Twitter.)
read more...

More Things for Palin Haters to Ponder ..

You can hate on Sarah Palin all you like, but I am seeing it more and more, as the weeks carry on. She is more Reaganesque than even the people who call her Reaganesque even realize. More to the point the hating on her is probably the most Reaganesque part of the whole deal. Fortunately those that hate her the most {reason's unknown or unintelligible} hate me now for even speaking kindly of her so I feel no need to worry about spilling secrets. My earliest recollections of Reagan are simply put, “He was a good speaker who made me feel good” and I could see that at 9 years old. Sarah Palin {as my liberal friends who are now calling her the real deal} would say is “Charming and makes me feel proud.”

This is the fundamental problem that the left has, because like Reagan they can spew hatred, and then Palin takes the microphone, and you're screwed. She is a hell of a lot smarter than she is painted, she is a hell of a lot more likeable than she is painted, and more to the point, she reminds most people of the “daughter” they wish they had. In the case of Ronald Reagan it was the fact that he would take to the microphone after a good spew of spin was thrown at him, and then people would instantly say “Hey! How dare they pick on my Grampa!” The fact that what Reagan was saying seemed so Grampa-Like resonated and turned the tables around on those that hated on him. The Palin “I wish she was my daughter” factor works the same way because most people look at the hate being piled on her and then start thinking that it is all part of the militant feminism attempt to scum up your daughter. Even if people are afraid to admit that they are thinking it, and more and more of them are finding out it is ok to say that.

Now even though I think Palin would be an excellent president, I am not coming right out and supporting that angle with her. I am simply promoting her as an American woman that should be taken seriously and not hated on simply for the different perspective that she displays. I can't laugh about it enough but women who make up roughly half the American population have NO VOICE in the America of today. Don't blame the messenger if you are hearing this for the first time, but there is a National Organization of Women {NOW} that WOMEN don't get a voice in choosing leadership, and to date I know NO woman that supports it. For that very reason alone I am assuming that a lot of women follow Sarah Palin rabidly for better or for worse. I have always wondered why groups of women haven't tried to sue NOW to change their name but that is a different blog some day I assume.

Let's get back on point here, as I got a copy of Sarah Palin's book for my daughter. My daughter is reasonably well informed but she had been inundated with her school and left leaning friends to know that Sarah Palin was “placed on the Republican ticket to make the presidential candidate look better and then lost him the election because she was such a rotten person” and I was shocked to hear that was what her teacher taught her in social studies class. In the end she asked me for a copy of Sarah Palin's book because it didn't take a rocket scientist to realize that her social studies teacher is an idiot. I remember the days when I had to sit through stupid social studies teacher after stupid social studies teacher and obliged her. I told her that I am not a social studies teacher so I will leave it up to her to make her own opinions after reading it, but did want her to read it and THEN think about what other people say. Her opinion was frightening if not completely spot on when she said “If the news people want me to be the opposite of her then they really are up to something,” which I agreed with and told her to keep reading.

This of course wouldn't have anything to do with Jane Roe would it? We almost never hear Norma McCorvey's statements since that landmark decision had come down because she merely thanks God that she DIDN'T have the abortion. She even headed a protest against Obama when he spoke at Notre Dame college. She was arrested for her actions during the Sonia Sotomayer confirmations while yelling out during Al Franken's opening statements. This sort of “shut up and do what we want” attitude towards women never seems to translate when it comes time for the women that gave their unborn children to “the cause” want to really speak about the experience. Now we are finally getting to the point where women that stand out against it from the beginning are to be destroyed before momentum can get their ideals heard. Again it is becoming an epic fail as the Reaganesque Sarah Palin opens her mouth, following that adorable smile, and speaks in that charming accent. Women in particular, as I said before, start thinking “Why can't my daughter be like her and less like what the social studies teachers tell her to be like?”

Now I had it pretty easy, as we had a life decision moment thrust upon us, and it's a pretty funny story actually. My daughter {now 17} had come to me with the form that a parent has to fill out to NOT allow condoms to be handed out to their children, back when she was 15. Now the school has forms for “Condom Denial” but the school policy is that they have them, and they aren't going to tell you about them, and if you don't submit one in person, your child will be given condoms upon request. I think it's moral stupidity to hand these things out at school but grudgingly support the decision because there are enough people in this world I wish didn't have children. Even if I had known about these things I wouldn't have gone and gotten one because of the hoops they make you jump through for your public shunning anyway, but as I said, my daughter had brought it to me, and asked that I fill it out. What kind of parent would I be if I had said no?

Her and I had a talk about it and she told me that she wasn't having sex until she was married {if you saw her Myspace page you would know she believes this whole heartedly .. telling your dad this and proclaiming it as a virtue to your friends are two different things} and I love her to death and all but am willing to admit that this is weird. She wanted hers to be in there as a “statement” and as a right wing whack job I had to appreciate her stance. I had to get my self righteousness up when I drove into school and dealt with the stares of utter hatred as I handed this thing in, and then had to actually tell the principal personally that it was my intention. Fortunately I went to school with this principal so he stared at his shoes when I did it. Being drunk and extremely violent all through school has it's advantages sometimes after all. The form was submitted all the same, and my daughter got to be proud of me for a change. It get's better though.

So during her “Health Class” the assignment was for every student to go to the School Nurse and get a condom so they could write a report on “the experience” of doing so. If your parent had filled out the form then you were to write a letter to your parent about “how that made you feel” and have them sign it. Let me tell you, this takes balls, and my school board had to suspend me from school board meetings for 90 days after that one, but I digress. My daughter refused to write that letter to me and had a different idea. She went to the nurses office to get the condom and was cheerfully handed one. Now it was time for me to be proud of my daughter, as she wrote the most scathing report on the state of the educational system in America. She stapled the condom and a copy of the form I had filled out to her report, and submitted it instead. She received an F for not following directions. After a long “chat” with the principal, in which he stared at his shoes, he read the report and actually came down pretty hard on the teacher calling the report excellent. She got a D.

You see where this is all going, so please feel free to keep trashing Sarah Palin. The negativity towards her like in the case of Ronald Reagan doesn't make anyone on that side look smart. On the contrary no matter how long and complicated they make their words it simply makes them look like hypocrites. In the end if Sarah Palin does become president thank the people that supported her, and blame the people that drove everyone to her. Gender, color, sexual orientation, or even lack of religion plays no part in who I vote for. I listen to everyone and I make my own decisions, but I always listen to those that hate by nature, and give those they hate a longer look. Keep up the good work mob!

Today I spent an hour arguing with people at the book store, as I was picking up copies of Going Rogue for all of my family. I have a new policy that I am enforcing after today. Anyone that wants to tell me what they hate about her have to read the book first. They will be quizzed. After having a half a dozen people tell me that they will never read the book, but they have every right to tell me what they think of her, even one of the liberals came over to me and said, “I'll just read the book, I didn't realize how stupid we sound until now,” so talk about your small victories! I read the book and thought it was good, but after I listened to the audiobook I started getting angry. The hate is getting old, and the book is definitely not justification for it. If none of my family reads it then I will be able to tell them to shut up. I read all their propaganda books, and have enjoyed using the stupidity against them, and they fear not having that on their side with this book. Don't get me wrong, if someone came up and led a conversation with, “I don't like her because she talks to openly about killing animals,” and I know they are a PETA member or something, then hell yeah they actually have a legitimate reason, for hating on her. Fair is fair, but if they lead the conversation with “She's stupid”, then I have them every time. ;8o)

Other Crap This Weirdo Publishes... Mental Notes & Random Musings {Daily Blog} The Crow's Nest {The Homepage of Jeremy Crow .. Not Always PG .. Be Warned}

All writings Copyright © 2009 .. The Crow's Nest & Anyplace Else That Lets Me Post It

read more...

Merry Christmas from the Graas Family


+Hail and blessed be the hour and moment in which the Son of God was born of the most pure Virgin Mary, at midnight, in Bethlehem, in piercing cold. In that hour vouchsafe, O my God! to hear my prayer and grant my desires, through the merits of Our Saviour Jesus Christ, and of His blessed Mother. Amen.

Blessings to all our dear readers on this joyous Christmas Eve! Each of us celebrates this special time in our own special way. Personally, I am a convert to the Catholic Faith - a former agnostic - and Christmas Eve is the anniversary of my Baptism, Confirmation and First Holy Communion. This means that I became united in a very special way with God on Christmas Eve.

All my life I believed in the Creator God. His Son, I wasn't so sure about. In God's good time, He revealed Himself to me and I became a believer on Ash Wednesday, 1991. After much instruction in the Faith, I made the decision to enter into His Holy Church and received those three holy sacraments on Christmas Eve, 1992. My joy was immeasurable and continues to this day, but at Christmas time in a more wondrous way.

Our Lord and Savior humbled Himself to become one of us so that we might share in all that is His. During this time, when we celebrate His Holy Birth, I ask that you remember the Child for whom there was no room in the inn. In becoming a little Child, God offered Himself over to the care of human parents whom He equipped with the grace to care for Him. Let us not forget this AWESOME GIFT of God's Son to the world. In uniting Himself with mankind, He has elevated the dignity of us ALL. We all know this on some level as we all become a bit kinder in honor of His Holy Gift.

My prayer for each of you is that with every breath you take in this life, you will have the peace of knowing that God has united Himself to you in a very special way through this Gift of Himself as a little Child in Bethlehem.

Many blessings to all of you from the Graas Family.

Lisa, George, Jesse, Teresa and Bethany
read more...

Open Letter to Sarah Palin by Hillary Supporters!


To understand Sarah Palin's ability to reach out and impact people, even  beyond politics, all one has to do is read this open letter to her.  You will be smiling as you read through it.  This is what Sarah Palin is all about and this is why she scares those on the extreme left.  Sarah Palin is a great model for many, many women in America.  We understand the struggle we endure daily to juggle the many hats we all wear.  So does Sarah Palin.  Even more important, Sarah shows us that we can do it  because she does do it - every day.

Here is a link to the open letter so you can read it for yourself.  Sarah Palin isn't finished.  She is just getting started...and women all over America are starting to come together around her, despite their differences in faith, politics, or what not.  She is a natural born leader and her time to lead is almost at hand...


read more...

President Obama Suspends Due Process in Executive Order Amendment

by Lisa Graas, editor --

President Obama has suspended our Constitutional right to due process with Interpol, the International Criminal Police Organization, Ed Morrissey (HotAir) and Andy McCarthy (NRO) report.

Mark Leon Goldberg takes issue with what he calls "un-informed fear mongering" on the part of conservative bloggers reporting on this. His only beef, really, is with reports that there are Interpol "officers" who may make arrests. He writes:
In real life, Interpol is also not an "international police force." This would imply that Interpol is composed of units of officers that can chase criminals across the world, Jason Bourne style. In fact, there is no such thing as an "Interpol officer," as such. Rather, law enforcement officers from Interpol's member states are seconded to the organization from national law enforcement agencies, like the FBI, U.S. Marshals, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, ect. [sic]

This is not just a semantic distinction. Officers seconded to Interpol do not have any sort of transnational executive arrest power. Rather, officers seconded to Interpol do things like coordinate busts of international child pornography rings. The people actually making the arrests, though, are members of the national law enforcement of the country where the crimes are committed. They are not "Interpol Officers" -- because there is no such thing as an "Interpol Officer." Further, "Interpol" can't arrest an American on American soil, a Canadian on Canadian soil or a Rwandan on a Rwandan soil. Only national law enforcement can do that.

From the INTERPOL website:
INTERPOL uses a system of colour-coded international notices to locate, arrest or provide warnings about fugitives and other criminals. In 2007 alone, co-operation between INTERPOL’s member countries led to more than 5,200 arrests across the globe.

The error in semantics regarding whom the "officers" are on the part of some conservative blogs notwithstanding, it's not in order for our President to suspend the due process rights of American citizens.

As expected, the mainstream media is not doing their job and reporting on this. NewsBusters has an overview on that. Excerpt:
[I]f the establishment media were interested in performing their public watchdog function, someone in the press somewhere would have reported on the issuance of this EO. Instead, it was first noted by blogs and real watchdog groups.

The average American will likely be troubled by President Obama's action here, but do nothing about it until there is a highly publicized incident of a person's due process rights being stripped away as a result of the order. In other words, cases will be tried in the "court" of American media and summarily dismissed or made issue of depending on producers and editors. The facts of any such case themselves could muddy the core issue of the President's initial action. Considering the establishment media's love for the President and unwillingness to allow him to be embarrassed, we aren't likely to see coverage of injustices that may come about as a result of President Obama's action here.

Stories like this underscore the necessity of alternative media...............not to mention the necessity of making sure President Obama is not re-elected. Further, it stresses the importance of electing Congressional representatives in 2010 who are interested in preserving and defending the Constitution and who will, therefore, speak out boldly against things like this so that the press may be pressured into covering it.

FYI: Here in Kentucky, I'm personally supporting Bill Johnson for Senate.

This administration continues to appall reasonable, Constitution-loving people everywhere.
read more...

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Purchase Going Rogue Pictures

By Adrienne Ross - www.motivationtruth.com



As you know, on November 21st, I was at the Rochester Going Rogue book signing. Photographer Shealah Craighead has now put the pictures of the event online, and they're available for purchase. She took over 1200 pictures in New York, and I am particularly excited because I had the honor of volunteering at the event, which affords me a multitude of pictures from which to choose. I will definitely be purchasing a few. Great job, Shealah!

Early in the photo album are two pictures of the Governor and I conversing, taken in the back upon her arrival, but there are so many others where I am in the background having the time of my life. Seeing these photographs was like reliving that amazing experience where I got to hear so many people interacting with her. I wrote about that experience in detail and included pictures and a video here and followed up with more pictures here.

Go straight to the Rochester, NY photo album by clicking here to see what it was like for me to work alongside Governor Palin that day, and see all the people who came out to show their support for America's common sense conservative.

Go here for a choice of other book tour stops of which you'd like to see pictures.

If you took part in the tour, treat yourself by purchasing one or more pictures, and if you know others who participated, why not surprise them with pictures they will surely cherish for many years to come?
read more...

FREE DOWNLOAD - Palin 2012 Graphic - BOOM!


"BOOM! Taste my nightstick!" (this classic will live on forever...)

Click on the image (or here) to download for your use and statement-making. Perfect for home or office!

Follow me on Twitter - @TwitToNande
Read my blog - thedesignconservative.com

read more...

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Sarah Palin: Midnight Votes, Backroom Deals, and a Death Panel

The following is a message from Sarah Palin, posted this evening on her Facebook page.

Last weekend while you were preparing for the holidays with your family, Harry Reid’s Senate was making shady backroom deals to ram through the Democrat health care take-over. The Senate ended debate on this bill without even reading it. That and midnight weekend votes seem to be standard operating procedures in D.C. No one is certain of what’s in the bill, but Senator Jim DeMint spotted one shocking revelation regarding the section in the bill describing the Independent Medicare Advisory Board (now called the Independent Payment Advisory Board), which is a panel of bureaucrats charged with cutting health care costs on the backs of patients – also known as rationing. Apparently Reid and friends have changed the rules of the Senate so that the section of the bill dealing with this board can’t be repealed or amended without a 2/3 supermajority vote. Senator DeMint said:

“This is a rule change. It’s a pretty big deal. We will be passing a new law and at the same time creating a senate rule that makes it out of order to amend or even repeal the law. I’m not even sure that it’s constitutional, but if it is, it most certainly is a senate rule. I don’t see why the majority party wouldn’t put this in every bill. If you like your law, you most certainly would want it to have force for future senates. I mean, we want to bind future congresses. This goes to the fundamental purpose of senate rules: to prevent a tyrannical majority from trampling the rights of the minority or of future congresses.”

In other words, Democrats are protecting this rationing “death panel” from future change with a procedural hurdle. You have to ask why they’re so concerned about protecting this particular provision. Could it be because bureaucratic rationing is one important way Democrats want to “bend the cost curve” and keep health care spending down?

The Congressional Budget Office seems to think that such rationing has something to do with cost. In a letter to Harry Reid last week, CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf noted (with a number of caveats) that the bill’s calculations call for a reduction in Medicare’s spending rate by about 2 percent in the next two decades, but then he writes the kicker:

“It is unclear whether such a reduction in the growth rate could be achieved, and if so, whether it would be accomplished through greater efficiencies in the delivery of health care or would reduce access to care or diminish the quality of care.”

Though Nancy Pelosi and friends have tried to call “death panels” the “lie of the year,” this type of rationing – what the CBO calls “reduc[ed] access to care” and “diminish[ed] quality of care” – is precisely what I meant when I used that metaphor.

This health care bill is one of the most far-reaching and expensive expansions of the role of government into our lives. We’re talking about putting one-seventh of our economy under the government’s thumb. We’re also talking about something as intimate to our personal well-being as medical care.

This bill is so unpopular that people on the right and the left hate it. So why go through with it? The Senate is planning to vote on this on Christmas Eve. Why the rush? Though we will begin paying for this bill immediately, we will see no benefits for years. (That’s the trick that allowed the CBO to state that the bill won’t grow the deficit for the next ten years.)

The administration’s promises of transparency and bipartisanship have been broken one by one. This entire process has been defined by midnight votes on weekends, closed-door meetings with industry lobbyists, and payoffs to politicians willing to sell their principles for sweetheart deals. Is it any wonder that Americans are so disillusioned with their leaders in Washington?

This is about politics, not health care. Americans don’t want this bill. Americans don’t like this bill. Washington has stopped listening to us. But we’re paying attention, and 2010 is coming.

###

Become a Supporter of Sarah Palin on Facebook

Follow Sarah Palin on Twitter
read more...

Sarah Palin Was Right: Cato's Alan Reynolds on Death Panels

by Lisa Graas, editor -

When the Democrats tell you there are 'no death panels' in their healthcare reform legislation, know this. They are lying to you. Alan Reynolds, writing for the Cato Institute, explained in an article today -- Death Panels? Sarah Palin Was Right
How could anyone believe Palin’s sensible comment about rationing was, in reality, a senseless fear of counseling? To say so was no mistake; it was an oft-repeated big lie.
Reynolds explains how they lied and to what extent they lied. He also describes the very real dangers of the Democrats' healthcare agenda succinctly:

Pending health care bills would make......government-mandated scarcity of health care much worse. There would be massive shifting of money away from Medicare toward Medicaid. But the extra Medicaid money would be spread around more thinly. States would cut benefits to the poor in order to accommodate millions of new, less-poor people lured into Medicaid, at least half of whom (7 or 8 million by my estimate) currently have employer-provided health insurance.

The Senate health bill supposedly intends to slash Medicare payment rates for physicians by 21% next year and more in future years, with permanent reductions in payments to other medical services too. It would also establish an Independent Payment Advisory Board which would be empowered to make deeper cuts which Congress could reject only with considerable difficulty. If that’s not quite a “death panel” it would surely not be pro-life in its impact.

The Congressional Budget Office says, “It is unclear whether such a reduction in the growth rate could be achieved, and if so, whether it would . . . reduce access to care or diminish the quality of care.”

Actually, it’s clear enough that the proposed Medicare cuts won’t be achieved, but that efforts in that direction will nonetheless reduce access to care and diminish its quality. The government can’t boost demand and cut prices without creating excess demand. And that, in turn, means rationing by longer waiting lines and by panels (rationing boards) making life-or death decisions for other people.

As Sarah Palin predicted, “Government health care will not reduce the cost; it will simply refuse to pay the cost. And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course.”
For the record, I'm in that group Reynolds' calls "the sick" because I am uninsured and have chronic Lyme Disease. My elderly mother is on Medicare and I have two disabled brothers on Medicaid. I've researched this at length as it affects my family in astronomical proportions and I have found that Sarah Palin has this right. Not only are 'death panels' in this legislation, the Democrats want to make them permanent. Yes, 'death panels' can be a scary term, but Palin used hyperbole to call attention to these 'panels' that will decide who lives and who dies. I, for one, appreciate straight talk, particularly on such an incredibly serious issue.

The left doesn't generally deny that there is rationing. They merely object to the term 'death panels' because it's 'scary' and, as Reynolds explained, they aver that it has to do with the end-of-life counseling, not the rationing many of them admit will occur. In regard to this rationing, the only argument the left seems to be able to come up with is that "insurance companies do it, too". This is rather like claiming that gun shops deny my right to own a gun because they charge me for the guns. It exhibits a profound ignorance of, or complacency toward, the rights delineated in our Constitution and how they are preserved. Our Constitution doesn't restrict gun shops and insurance companies. It does restrict our federal government.

Government denial of healthcare is unConstitutional because we have a "right" to it. If we have a "right" to something, does it mean government must provide it? Conservatives say no. Liberals say yes, IF you're talking about healthcare. If you're talking about guns, though, they'll object.....strongly.

Our right to life includes our right to health care, and if government rations care, it violates our right to healthcare. It really is a very simple thing to understand if you take the time to understand the difference between a "right" and an "entitlement". Unfortunately, most people don't have the time or the patience to study the jurisprudence on this, nor the intentions of the Founding Fathers. It's also unfortunate for America that the left doesn't interpret the Constitution with any constraint. They apparently just make it up as they go along based on whatever feels good at the moment and how much money/votes they can get.

America, there's never been a more important time to stand up for life. I urge you to stand with Sarah Palin on this. She's right on target and we are in deep, deep trouble as a nation if this stands.

Cross-posted at Texas for Sarah Palin, LisaGraas.com and Mommy



Bookmark and Share
read more...

Trig Palin's Testimony

By Adrienne Ross - www.motivationtruth.com



(Video H/T Sinistar)

When I see Trig Palin, I smile. When I see him smiling and playing around with his father--as he is in the video--and kissing his mother--as he is in the picture--I smile even more.

Trig is a testimony to the beauty and value of all God's children. I thank God for families, like the Palins, who recognized from the beginning that "every good and every perfect gift" comes from God.

I shake my head when I think about this startling statistic: 90% of Down Syndrome babies are aborted. Look at Trig's smile, hear his giggle, sense how much his father loves him, feel how much he loves his mom--and tell me he's not worthy of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." You can't, because he is, as is every single life.

Thank God for His wisdom; He gave Trig to just the right family.
read more...

There are Death Panels In the Senate Health Care Bill


Read it and weep, Politifact. Kiss beating Factcheck.org in the truth market goodbye. It's amazing that a so called "fact checking" organization doesn't know the difference between literal and rhetorical. In their zeal to score points off the Palin name, drive up revenue, and get lots of PR, Politifact forgot one slighly important thing, the facts. Instead, they chose to fact check a hyperbole, call a highly respected political leader a liar and then have the U.S. Senate prove them wrong after they had handed out their coveted "biggest lie of the year award."

Is that like "worst person in the world?" Palin now holds two dubious honors, coveted by any conservative who knows that a liberal in wonderland always knows that's what's down is up and what's up and down.

William Kristol wrote of the Senate health care bill: "As people learn more about the sleazy sweetheart deals and the creepy permanent death panels—this thing could still go down in the House next month in the face of popular outrage." On the same Weekly Standard blog, John McCormack wrote "Paging Sarah Palin: the death panel is unkillable" in an analysis of Jim Demint pointing out parts of the Senate bill that were being written so they could be un-repealable.

That was check. Here's mate. The Cato Institute filleted Politifact's claims that "death panels" was a lie.

What Palin wrote about death panels clearly had nothing to do with counseling or with any other specifics in seminal House bill. What she wrote was: “Government health care will not reduce the cost; it will simply refuse to pay the cost. And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course.”

This writer tweeted that the Cato Institute had properly explained "death panels." But, it was actually Palin herself who explained the hyperbole. Cato merely quoted her. It just took some in this highly "intelligent" world of letters, journalism and punditry a little longer than others to realize that the answer was already in the question.

To quote John McCain, "why can't they just take her at her word?"

UPDATE: Sarah Palin posted a note on her Facebook Page: Midnight Votes, Backroom Deals, and a Death Panel

read more...

Monday, December 21, 2009

Jewish Internet Defense Force Speaks Out Against Anti-Semitism Online

by Lisa Graas, editor --

Isn't it amazing how you can go through life thinking that most people recognize and condemn the same great evils of history you do? And isn't it horrifying when you find that, more often than you would like to believe, there are still people walking around out there who are ignorant of these evils? So has been my experience in regard to the Holocaust.

Thankfully, there was no shortage of eyewitness testimony to the horrors Europe unleashed, primarily upon her Jewish citizens, during World War II. I recall my mother telling me when I was a teenager that one of her schoolteachers had been a part of the liberation of one of the death camps and that he had shown his class actual photos he had taken showing the brutality found there. I've read memoir after memoir of Holocaust survivors -- my favorite is Alicia, by Alicia Appleman-Jurman -- and visited the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in DC........twice. I've studied the "reasons" for it (e.g., Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's Hitler's Willing Executioners and Martin Gilbert's The Holocaust: A History of the Jews of Europe During the Second World War) and pored over the Nazi propaganda in bitter astonishment. Thank goodness I was blessed with a desire to seek truth and justice, but I have learned since I started becoming active online that my belief that only a handful of people remain who deny the Holocaust was misplaced.


Holocaust denial is everywhere and when it comes to fighting misinformation online, the Jewish Internet Defense Force is on the job. I want to welcome @JIDF, the latest member of the Palin Twibe on Twitter. You are encouraged to follow their account and RT as often as possible to help to combat anti-Semitism online, but particularly to stand strong against Holocaust deniers. Watch for @JIDF tweets in the Palin Twibe twitter stream, too, as the Jewish Internet Defense Force feed has been added to our TwitterFeed.


Together, we can make a difference.






Follow the Palin Twibe.


Join the Palin Twibe.


read more...

Flying into 2010

I hate a fly. Yes, hate is a strong word...my dad said so. But truly, I do. I hate a fly.

That fact was reiterated to me as I was reading Dickens this week. I know now that my dislike for a fly is not just due to the fact that they aggravate me. It's deeper. They are stupid.

Charles Dickens in A Tale of Two Cities sets up a scene in the wine-shop as so...

There were a few customers, drinking or not drinking, standing or seated, sprinkled about. The day was very hot, and heaps of flies, who were extending their inquisitive and adventurous perquisitions into all the glutinous little glasses near madame, fell dead at the bottom. Their decease made no impression on the other flies out promenading, who looked at them in the coolest manner (as if they themselves were elephants, or something as far removed), until they met the same fate. Curious to consider how heedless flies are!

Yeppers. I surmise the heedless flies that are currently in office do not see their impending fate in 2010. They only remember that President Obama can swat them and brag about it as he did during his famous fly killah interview. Keep him happy by circling the Hill and landing on all carrion placed before them, and everything will be fine. Veer off course by rejecting the offerings and be called into the Flight Controller's office for a flight plan adjustment.

I perceive they are told to ignore the other flies that just met their doom this past November.

Are our elected officials so very sure they can continue to promenade in defiance of the majority of Americans with no recourse in view? Do they truly see a bright future ahead for them? As they are lured into the spider's web of presidential deceit, is there a chance, a very minute chance, they feel any fear?

Gov. Sarah Palin, in a recent SarahPAC missive, stated:

"After all our travels, it's even more obvious to me that the winds of change are blowing strong. At every stop people talked about the need to take our country back. So let's do it! 2010 is just around the corner and with it will come one of the most critical elections of our lifetime. With important House and Senate races across our nation and dozens of gubernatorial races we have the chance to make a positive difference throughout our country."


Drink up, flies, to your hearts' content, but just as the maggots you derived from, you will once again be bottom dwellers...this time in the dregs of the wine glass you once embraced, in a drunken stupor, as life giving.

Impression-less. Heedless. Stupid. I hate a fly.

(Image by shanik on flickr)
read more...

Sunday, December 20, 2009

Beltway ‘Conservative’ Blowhards Do Little to Impact Iowa Republican Opinion

Reeling Conservatives I was over at The Bean Walker and noticed an op/ed by David Mastio at The Des Moines Register.  Who is David Mastio you may ask?  I’m not familiar either, but he is the “Senior Editor for Online Opinion” at The  Washington Times, and obviously he thinks we should care about his opinion regarding who Iowa Republicans support in 2012 and who we give our money to.

He chastises Iowa Republicans, and what is our crime?  Not only did Iowa Republicans give Sarah Palin a high approval rating in a recent Iowa Poll, but we also spent too much money on her book, Going Rogue: An American Life, as well as, time waiting in line for her book signing in Sioux City.  I’m also sure he’s wondering why establishment darling, Mitt Romney, still isn’t as well liked as Palin or Mike Huckabee here in the Hawkeye State.  As he peers down his nose at the unwashed masses who identify with the Republican Party of Iowa the Iowa Politics “expert” Mastio bloviates:

Once I thought there couldn't be anything dumber than the Democrats' combo of a giant auto bailout and "Cash for Clunkers." We'll squander untold billions, but completely fail to change the reality that there are fewer and fewer auto jobs, factories and dealers. When U.S. sales plummet from 17 million cars a year to around 10 million, there's not much a bailout can do other than slow the rout.

I was wrong. Iowa Republicans have come up with something worse. Call it "Cash for Quitters." A whopping two-thirds of self-identified Republicans have a positive view of former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, according to the Iowa Poll, and, as a result, they're willing to line up in the cold by the hundreds while shelling out cash for her new book.

But every dollar that goes to Palin - in book sales now or campaign donations later - is a dollar that can't be used to help a Republican who actually has a prayer of being president.

What is his reasoning?  Because she left office early.

There's no getting past the fact that Palin is a quitter. In more than two centuries, nobody has ever been elected president when their only turn in high office was aborted in the middle just because doing the people's work got to be too much of a drag.

Now if she decides to run, a big if, no doubt that will be an item of discussion.  But to say “doing the people’s work got to be too much of a drag,” tells me that Mr. Mastio doesn’t have a clue about what was going on in the State  of Alaska, and he further proved it by writing:

Conservatives can say a lot of bad things about Bill Clinton, but one thing we can't say is that he ran from a fight. When voters took the House of Representatives and the Senate from his party, he still came in to work. When Republicans impeached him, he didn't give up and walk away, he bombed the former Yugoslavia. Liberals can say a lot of nasty things about George W. Bush. Even if he was a dumb warmonger, he kept right on dumbly warmongering, no matter what voters or the Democrats threw at him…

…If anything, politics in Washington, D.C., is tougher than the game they play in Juneau. If Palin can't handle cold politics on a glacier, she's not going to fare much better in the hot politics of the D.C. swamp.

In many ways, the 1994 elections did President Clinton a favor.  He got to govern from the center which is what he wanted to do anyway.  As far as his impeachment, fair or not, it was his behavior that led to that point.  Let’s not paint President Clinton to be an innocent victim or holding on to his position as not running from a fight.  I’m glad he was able to function and continue to accomplish the role of Commander-in-Chief.  As did President Bush… that is precisely the point.

Juneau is not D.C., and Governors do not have as much protection, or in many ways, power to continue to govern when their administration is in gridlock.  Governor Palin accomplished her agenda in the 2 1/2 years she was in office.  She stepped down to make sure that agenda would progress under an administration that wasn’t having frivolous ethics charges & FOIA filed against them left and right.  Her administration was in gridlock, and the state was wasting taxpayer money.  Governor Sean Parnell, so far, has had a pretty smooth tenure.  When she stepped out of the Governor’s Mansion she was able to take the fight to the next level.

She wouldn’t have been able to speak out on the health care debate, cap and tax, climate change, Afghanistan, and common sense conservatism in general if she were still Governor.  She wouldn’t be able to campaign in 2010 for good candidates, why?  Until the Alaksa Executive Ethics Act is addressed she’d still be incurring more complaints and incurring more debt (which this book I’m sure helped her pay off since her legal defense fund is frozen due to… you guessed it, another ethics complaint).

Perhaps wasting taxpayer money in order to be in a better political position is ok with Mastio.  That shouldn’t surprise us as he’s used to operating within the Beltway and that is how the game is played.  We in Iowa, if I can be bold enough to speak on behalf of those who do have a favorable opinion of Palin, are sick of politics as usual.

If she decides to run, and Iowa Republicans give their backing to her it won’t because of “just hope.”  It will because we see her as the real deal, and that we believe she has the right policies and experience to undo the damage that has been done.  It’ll be because we trust her over plastic, change as the wind blows, type of candidates like Mitt Romney.  Snarky and condescending op/eds won’t do much to change our mind.

In the meantime, I encourage all Iowa Republicans (and any Republican, independent, or conservative Democrat anywhere) to continue to “waste” their money by purchasing her book or by donating to SarahPAC.  It will be money better spent than sending it to anyone Mastio supports.

Shane Vander Hart is the editor of Caffeinated Thoughts.  He loves to connect with fellow rogues so feel free to follow him on Twitter or friend him on Facebook.

read more...

Friday, December 18, 2009

Dissolving the Palin Prejudice

By Adrienne Ross - www.motivationtruth.com

I don't agree with everything Stephen H. Dinan has to say about Governor Palin, but I am willing to listen to what he has to say. The reason is simple: he's chosen to listen to what she has to say. In so doing, he has taken the road less traveled by the mainstream media. He chose to travel down Going Rogue Lane to find out who the Governor really is, rather than who the haters want people to believe she is. He chose to get to know her himself. The best way to do that, obviously, is to read her memoir and hear her words "unfiltered," as she says. He does just that. For this I commend him.

So what led Dinan on this journey?

Over Thanksgiving, I was hiking with my brother-in-law when he commented that he only knew two kinds of people: those who loved Sarah Palin and those who hated her. Nobody was in the gray zone. While I didn't consider myself a "hater," I also knew that she had triggered intense reactions in me when she joined the Republican ticket. After Obama's victory, the fear of her becoming President subsided along with the negative charge, but I had to confess to a lingering prejudice beneath the surface.

One week later, I bought her autobiography, Going Rogue. Why? To dissolve my own prejudice and to better understand how we as a culture can go beyond the extreme political polarizations that have so paralyzed our country.

[...]

So reading Going Rogue was something of a test for myself - could I find the place of appreciation, respect, and even love for Sarah Palin?

What I found is that it wasn't really that hard, actually, simply by taking the time to meet her on her own turf rather than through sounds bites, spin, and polarized media battles. Reading someone's personal memoir is an intimate journey into their inner sanctum, and I developed a real appreciation for Sarah in reading the book.

This brings to mind a quote from my favorite novel, To Kill A Mockingbird. Atticus Finch taught his six year old daughter, Scout, a very important life-lesson when he said:

You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view...until you climb into his skin and walk around in it.

This further reinforces my philosophy that most of the lessons one needs to learn can be gathered from Harper Lee's classic novel.

Stephen H. Dinan came away from Going Rogue with a deeper understanding of Governor Palin, her upbringing, her love for family, her patriotic passion, and her desire to serve. He acknowledges, too, the prejudices she continues to face. He admits what liberals have been loath to admit--that she arouses fear and worry in people--and he doesn't exempt himself from those same emotions. Furthermore, he states that this has led to

a barrage of distorted stories, inflated fears, and downright misrepresentations, some of which were quite damaging to her family.

It's the sad truth, yet it's refreshing to finally hear someone confess what we've always known to be true.

The bottom line is that Dinan had the courage to put aside his own prejudices in favor of the truth. And when he did, he discovered the Governor Palin who always existed, but one he had heretofore been deaf and blind to because he had been listening to and looking at others who themselves didn't know her. Going Rogue allowed him to get a real look.

Although he doesn't agree with every position Governor Palin takes, he has come to find what Scout finds at the end of To Kill A Mockingbird when she finally sees Boo Radley, the man she has known only through the rumors and smears of her neighbors. Scout realizes Boo cannot be honestly defined by others. The real Boo Radley would write his own story for Scout Finch to read.

To Kill A Mockingbird ends with this exchange between Scout and her father, Atticus, when she realizes Boo is not the monster he has been made out to be:

"When they finally saw him, why he hadn't done any of those things...Atticus, he was real nice..."

"Most people are, Scout, when you finally see them."

Dinan made the effort to see Governor Palin.

Stephen H. Dinan's article is a good one--and it's published in the Huffington Post, of all places. Maybe they'll get the message and take a look also.

Read the full article, Dissolving the Palin Prejudice.

(H/T Fay)
read more...