Friday, December 31, 2010

Main Lesson Learned from Governor Palin in 2010

By Adrienne Ross - www.motivationtruth.com

As 2010 winds down, I stop to reflect on what I've learned most from Governor Palin. I end the year with a very simple but profound lesson from her, as she has shown herself to be everything I already knew she was--authentic and fearless.

Governor Palin took on health care, the economy, the Ground Zero mosque, Iran, Arizona's attempt to secure its own borders, Wikileaks, energy independence, and the Gulf oil spill. She became a political analyst for Fox News where she weighed in on pressing issues of the day, sometimes from the studios of New York, sometimes from her home in Wasilla. Governor Palin traveled the U.S., speaking up for Constitutional freedoms, and she selflessly went to Haiti to serve those still dealing with the effects of a devastating earthquake. She supported Bristol on "Dancing with the Stars," took us through Alaska via "Sarah Palin's Alaska," and wrote another successful book, reflecting on "family, faith, and flag." She ushered in a new era of strong, active women and named them Mama Grizzlies, a distinction they still carry with pride. Perhaps most notable, she helped change the face of Congress by successfully endorsing a plethora of candidates--male and female, Black, Hispanic, Indian, and White, who will put an end to business as usual in Washington and do the people's business instead.

Impressive as this partial list of Governor Palin's accomplishments is, what stands out most to me is not what she did, but how she did it. Whereas Dana Perino may choose to babble about Governor Palin's authenticity, the truth speaks louder. No one would put herself on the line as she did without firmly believing in each stand she took. Governor Palin went through hell because she called attention to "death panels," and only now are people recognizing that she had the foresight to see what most others chose to deny. She was labeled a racist because she stood with Arizona in their effort to secure their own borders and became the most prominent face of the Tea Party movement. She was accused of being intolerant because she questioned the appropriateness of building a mosque in the vicinity of Ground Zero. Her judgment was placed on the chopping block because she dared endorse some people with whom the Establishment took issue. Nonetheless, she did not hide behind what was safe, but she went running toward what was right. While supposed heir-to-the-Republican-nomination-throne, Mitt Romney, often hid until the eleventh hour--and sometimes much later--to endorse a candidate, the Governor spoke out, came out, campaigned, raised money, and stood by her decisions.

Whether certain individuals like the Governor's decisions or not, her fearlessness in making them and standing by them is unquestionable. She stands head and shoulders above the rest because she stands on principle. This is the kind of leader Americans are seeking. This is the kind of leader who inspires the support that she receives from ordinary barbarians. This is also the kind of leader who scares both the Left and the Right to death.

In 2010, Governor Palin surely demonstrated what it means to be busy, but she did so much more than that. She focused on issues that matter most to Americans, and she didn't let the pressure closing in on all sides divert her from doing what she knew to be best for her nation, or her family, or even her state. May we be just as fearless in our stand for truth, freedom, and justice. Governor Palin is a living example of what authenticity is really about, what it costs, and the rewards it brings. No matter who likes it or who doesn't, with her, what you see is what you get. And we see a Mama Grizzly intent on standing on the right side of all the right issues and will not back down.

As we head into 2011, I want to carry this lesson of fearlessness and authenticity with me; it reminds me of the advice Shakespeare shared in Hamlet when he wrote:
This above all: to thine ownself be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man.
Farewell: my blessing season this in thee!

Happy New Year!
read more...

The Palins Make Pies on Sarah Palin's Alaska


In this outtake from Sarah Palin's Alaska, Episode Six "Rafting and Dog Mushing," Governor Palin and daughter Piper make rhubarb pies, and Piper's creation is delicious. Gov. Palin and Piper frequently bake together.


The Palins Make Pies retrieved from PalinTV

read more...

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Governor Palin Will Decide Her Own "Role"

Yesterday, Ian Lazaran posted this in response to Jennifer Rubin's most recent Washington Post, anti-Palin installment. Is it just me or does it seem like Rubin always posts these pieces directed at Governor Palin, on a Wednesday? Anyway, in Rubin's latest she writes (emphasis mine):
[W]hen one talks to Republicans in private gatherings, on the Hill, and even in Tea Party gatherings it is rare to find anyone who labels Palin as the party's leader or who looks to her for guidance on major issues. This is not a slur on Palin; she has an important and essential role in rallying the base, getting under Obama's skin and debunking much of what passes for conventional wisdom.
It is laughable to think that Jennifer Rubin is spending much time at tea parties talking to the folks about who they look to for "guidance on major issues." I'll happily retract my last sentence if anyone has attended a Tea Party and personally witnessed Jennifer Rubin taking pulse of the people there. But for now, I'm not buying it.

Now, concerning what Republicans say in "private gatherings"... I really have no idea what the sort of Republican Rubin must spend her time with, say in their private gatherings. Most of the registered Republicans I know happen to be Palin supporters, but once again, I think Rubin is pulling her conclusions from her own vivid imagination.

Rubin's fables are not the issue however. What she did in that paragraph was to suggest that Governor Palin is good for the party in a certain "role," just not a leading one. This is becoming a familiar tone with some in the Republican establishment.

Last Sunday, Bill Kristol said on the Fox News Sunday Panel that:
She could play a big role supporting someone else and articulating issues - and not running this time.
It seems that the talking heads are trying to push a 'Sarah Palin as activist, not candidate' narrative. At least they admit that she is "important" and has the ability to "rally" Conservatives. They especially like when those rallies turn into money for the Republican party.

What these over-sized egos of the pundit class do not seem to understand is that Governor Palin is an effective leader, and not just in an activist role. They ignore her many accomplishments as an executive, and show disdain for her unconventional approach. They downplay her support with conservatives in their columns and on their panels, but they themselves are not members of the grassroots, which is where Governor Palin receives most of her support. So, how would they really known what kind of support Governor Palin truly has? Their criticism is condescending at best but it also lacks credibility, most notably when they cite Daily Kos pollsters as their "empirical evidence."

Nobody knows if Governor Palin is running for President or not. Thankfully, it is not up to "chattering class" to declare what "role" she will play now, or in the future. Governor Palin will decide her own roll.
read more...

Dana Perino, Governor Palin Can Go Camping Today AND Think Tomorrow

By Adrienne Ross - www.motivationtruth.com

As I was away for several days, some things I normally would have jumped on, I let sit for a couple days. However, I certainly want to chime in on former White House Press Secretary Dana Perino's comments about Governor Palin's "authenticity."

According to Perino, Governor Palin's ability to go camping one day and write a thoughtful op-ed about Iran the next is somehow "discordant." After enjoying the great outdoors, supposedly her policy writings the next day don't "sound like her." Well, this is a different take on things. Usually, people--those who aren't paying attention--say the Governor isn't dealing with the issues. Perino is aware enough to know that clearly Governor Palin is constantly dealing with the issues, so she instead states that when doing so it doesn't sound like her--because of her love for the fresh air of Alaska. She calls her ability to go camping and do some serious thinking "weird."

I may not always agree with Perino, but I do often enjoy listening to her perspective. She's way out in left field in this case, however, and her viewpoint is completely ridiculous, or shall I say weird?

Yes, how odd it is that someone could actually think a person has to be one dimensional to be authentic. Anyone who even gives credence to the idea that a person can't do various and sundry things, and use a different voice when doing them, is small-minded and lacks common sense. Anyone who has ever held a conversation with her child on Sunday, for example, sounds quite different than she sounds with her clients at work on Monday. And who speaks the same at an amusement park as they speak at a town hall meeting? Hopefully, no one. Yet each voice is as authentic as the other--in its proper environment. Whether Perino was airing her own feelings, or speaking about how others view Governor Palin, her validation of such a small way of thinking is...well, small-minded.

This reminds me of people who think a pretty girl or a star athlete can't simultaneously be insightful and intelligent. Who knew people still thought this way? It's absurd. I sometimes run into people I haven't seen in years who incorrectly remember me as a "gym teacher," and I have students now who will say, "You should be a gym teacher." And why do they say this? Because I kick butt on the basketball court, of course! In their minds, while they don't even realize it, one can't be athletic and also do other things well. On the other hand, those who have never seen me play ball, but have only witnessed me teach English, cannot imagine me doing anything but that. To these groups of people I point out that a person can actually have a variety of interests and do several of those things quite well. News bulletin: a person can score a touchdown today and pass a biology test tomorrow. One would not think someone as bright and experienced as Dana Perino would have to be made aware of this, and the fact that she doesn't think one can camp, hunt, log, white water raft, or whatever one day and still contemplate issues like national security or the economy the next says a lot about how out of touch she is.

Rob Port adds:
The intent here is to suggest that Palin isn’t smart enough to have her own opinions, and that her serious policy writings are the words of someone else. Which is pretty unfair as even Perino admits that plenty of politicians use speech writers and other advisers to craft their policy writings.

But I understand why many in Washington DC are looking askance as Palin. She’s not the traditional politician. She’s not orthodox by any stretch of the imagination. Her power and influence isn’t dependent on the traditional political and media structures. I think that makes a lot of people feel threatened.

Read more from Port and see the Perino clip here.
read more...

Mark Belling: Reagan-Palin Similarities are Striking


"The similarities between President Ronald Reagan and Governor Palin are striking," Mark Belling said December 28 as he guest hosted Mark Levin's radio show. Of all the 2012 Presidential hopefuls, only Governor Palin "came out initially against the new START Treaty, came out strongly against quantitative easing saying it would trash the dollar." Gov. Palin was the only one who embraced Congressman Ryan's Roadmap. "The more I watch Sarah Palin beefing herself up on the substance stuff in the meantime staying constantly in the public eye, it just reminds me of what Reagan did between '76 and '80," Belling said.


Reagan/Palin Similarities are Striking – Mark Belling retrieved from PalinTV

read more...

Cal Thomas Says Governor Palin Was Right; I Sure Wish She Had Been Wrong

By Adrienne Ross - www.motivationtruth.com

Thanks to The New York Times, this week has reopened the case of "death panels" that Governor Palin warned us about. She was slammed, ridiculed, and told to leave the room. Now, people are walking back their earlier reactions.

Cal Thomas, who has certainly not always spoken of Governor Palin in glowing terms, admits in a Townhall.com article that she was correct on this health care issue and deserves an apology:
Sarah Palin deserves an apology. When she said that the new health-care law would lead to "death panels" deciding who gets life-saving treatment and who does not, she was roundly denounced and ridiculed.

Now we learn, courtesy of one of the ridiculers -- The New York Times -- that she was right. Under a new policy not included in the law for fear the administration's real end-of-life game would be exposed, a rule issued by the recess-appointed Dr. Donald M. Berwick, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, calls for the government to pay doctors to advise patients on options for ending their lives. These could include directives to forgo aggressive treatment that could extend their lives.

This rule will inevitably lead to bureaucrats deciding who is "fit" to live and who is not. The effect this might have on public opinion, which by a solid majority opposes Obamacare, is clear from an e-mail obtained by the Times. It is from Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), who sent it to people working with him on the issue. Oregon and Washington are the only states with assisted-suicide laws, a preview of what is to come at the federal level if this new regulation is allowed to stand. Blumenauer wrote in his November e-mail: "While we are very happy with the result, we won't be shouting it from the rooftops because we aren't out of the woods yet. This regulation could be modified or reversed, especially if Republican leaders try to use this small provision to perpetuate the 'death panel' myth."

Ah, but it's not a myth, and that's where Palin nailed it. All inhumanities begin with small steps; otherwise the public might rebel against a policy that went straight to the "final solution." All human life was once regarded as having value, because even government saw it as "endowed by our Creator." This doctrine separates us from plants, microorganisms and animals.

[...]

Do you see where this leads? First the prohibition against abortion is removed and "doctors" now perform them. Then the assault on the infirm and elderly begins. Once the definition of human life changes, all human lives become potentially expendable if they don't measure up to constantly "evolving" government standards.

It will all be dressed up with the best possible motives behind it and sold to the public as the ultimate benefit. The killings, uh, terminations, will take place out of sight so as not to disturb the masses who might have a few embers of a past morality still burning in their souls. People will sign documents testifying to their desire to die, and the government will see it as a means of "reducing the surplus population," to quote Charles Dickens.

When life is seen as having ultimate value, individuals and their doctors can make decisions about treatment that are in the best interests of patients. But when government is looking to cut costs as the highest good and offers to pay doctors to tell patients during their annual visits that they can choose to end their lives rather than continue treatment, that is more than the proverbial camel's nose under the tent. That is the next step on the way to physician-assisted suicide and, if not stopped, government-mandated euthanasia.

Read the full piece here.

Once again, Governor Palin is right on all the right issues. This issue, however, is utterly disturbing for any of us with even a modicum of decency and respect for life. This might be the first time I've wished she had been wrong.
read more...

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Obama Has Lost The World: Why We Need Sarah Palin




Liberal pundits mock the rough and ready style of conservatives like Reagan, Bush or Palin in world affairs, but what they fail to realize is that the over-educated naivete, trendy cosmopolitanism and buzzword rich approach of a Kerry or Obama come off as laughably pathetic on the world stage.

Republicans might be hated, but they can’t be ignored. Democrats on the other hand are catspaws and pawns, fools who are so sure of their cleverness and determined to embrace every culture in the way that only the graduates of Ivy League institutions can, that any Third World vendor could twirl them around his fingers.

~ Daniel Greenfield

By Gary P Jackson

Writing for Eurasia Review, Daniel Greenfield has written an absolutely blistering take on Barack Obama's inability to lead and his status as a joke worldwide. Greenfield also points to Sarah Palin, along with Presidents George W. Bush and Ronald Reagan as the sort of tough leaders who garner respect on the world stage.

Greenfield is a columnist born in Israel and currently living in New York City. He is a contributing editor at Family Security Matters and writes a daily blog column on Islamic Terrorism, Israeli and American politics and Europe's own clash of civilizations which can be found at Sultanknish.blogspot.com.

Here's a taste of what he has to say:

After the 2010 elections, it’s not exactly news that Obama has lost America. But in a less public referendum, he also lost the world. Obama’s cocktail party tour of the world’s capitals may look impressive on a map, but is irrelevant on a policy level. In less than two years, the White House has gone from being the center of world leadership to being irrelevant, from protecting world freedom to serving as a global party planning committee.

Even the Bush Administration’s harshest critics could never have credibly claimed that George W. Bush was irrelevant. He might have been hated, pilloried and shouted about– but he couldn’t be ignored. However Obama can be safely ignored. Invited to parties, given the chance to show off his cosmopolitan sophisticated by reciting one or two words in the local lingo, read off a teleprompter, along with some cant about the need for everyone to pull together and make the world a better place, and then dismissed for the rest of the evening.

As a world leader, he makes a passable party guest. He has a broad smile, brings along his own gifts and is famous in the way that celebrities, rather than prime ministers and presidents are famous. On an invitation list, he is more Bono than Sarkozy, Leonardo DiCaprio not Putin. You don’t invite him to talk turkey, not even on Thanksgiving. He’s just one of those famous people with a passing interest in politics who gets good media attention, but who has nothing worthwhile to say.

The only countries who take Obama seriously, are the ones who have to. The leaders of Great Britain, Israel and Japan– who have tied their countries to an enduring alliance with America based on mutual interests and values, only to discover that the latest fellow to sit behind the Oval Office desk no longer shares those values and couldn’t give less of a damn about American interests. It’s no wonder that European leaders ignore him as much as possible. Or that Netanyahu visited America, while Obama was abroad. Or that Japanese politics have become dangerously unstable.

On the enemy side, the growing aggressiveness of China, North Korea, Iran, Hezbollah and Al Qaeda can all be attributed to the global consensus that no one is at home in the White House.And if no one is at home in the White House, then that’s a perfect time to slap the big boy around the yard. China is doing it economically, the rest are doing it militarily. They’re all on board with Obama’s Post-American vision of the world. But unlike him and most liberals, they have a clear understanding of what that means. The America of some years back, which actually intimidated Libyan dictator Khaddafi into giving up his nuclear program, without lifting a hand against him is long gone. So is the Cedar Revolution. Syria and Iran are back in charge in Lebanon. And in Afghanistan, the Taliban are laughing at our soft power outreach efforts.

Obama’s soft power approach emphasizes the ‘soft’ and forgets the ‘power’. It neglects even Clinton era understandings about the role of America in the world, and reverts instead to a Carter era sense of guilt that bleeds into hostility toward American interests and allies. While the rest of the world puts their own interests first, they act like a cog in some imaginary global community, turning and turning toward the distant horizon of international brotherhood. While China, Russia and most of the world walk down their backs and up their jellyfish spines, laughing all the way. And America’s allies gird themselves and prepare for the worst.

There is much, much more here.

Greenfield is spot on. Obama is more like an international jet-setting "playboy" than the President of the United States, a position that was also formally known as the Leader of the Free World. Obama is just the opposite. His ideology, a socialist-communist mix that centers around being a victim in need of "social justice" is a poor fit for the position of leader [in any capacity] but most especially the leader of all free peoples.

Obama doesn't even grasp the fundamentals of our own Constitution, one of the most important, and enduring documents ever created. He has professed on may occasions that it is a "flawed document." If this man finds our Constitution, a covenant between the people and government, guaranteeing our God given rights to Liberty and Freedom from an oppressive government, how can he be expected to lead the entire world, standing up for Freedom and Liberty everywhere?

We've talked a lot about Michelle Obama's crusade on fat. The reason being is it is the perfect example of the totalitarianism progressives believe in. The entire progressive philosophy centers around a command and control centralized government that has total domination of it's citizens, down the the most minute levels. It's no wonder Obama seems to identify more with our enemies, who run brutal regimes where their people have absolutely no freedom. They are so close to the progressive utopia that Obama and his fellow travelers envision for America.

We watched in horror as Obama stood by and did nothing while Freedom and Liberty seeking Iranians, finally summoning up the courage to protest their tyrannical and oppressive government, were slaughtered in the streets. After years of President George W Bush telling the Iranian people our quarrel wasn't with them, but with their leaders, and we would support them, when the time came for America to stand with these brave Iranians, Obama hid out, and then when he finally surfaced, he sided with the Iranian regime, not the Freedom and Liberty seeking Iranian people.

It was a pathetic performance by an even more pathetic man.

Sarah Palin has long spoken out about Obama's inability to lead. She talked about this during her Vice Presidential nomination acceptance speech in 2008, and has since written policy papers and op-eds dissecting the Obama foreign policy disaster. What she calls enemy-centric, is quite simply, Obama's want to coddle our enemies, while dismissing our allies worldwide. In my opinion, it's because Obama admires our enemies more than our allies, but that's just me.

Sarah Palin has demonstrated that she knows the difference between friend and foe, and has a solid grasp on how to deal with them. Her latest was taking Obama and most of Congress to task for wanting to sign the START treaty, a horrible document that ties our hands.

Obama and Senate leader Harry Reid jammed that treaty through the advise and consent process without a single hearing or meaningful discussion. It was so "important" that it just HAD to be ratified before Christmas, no matter how terrible it is. We NOW know the Russians are still going through the process of vetting and approving it. Who would have ever thought the Russian Parliament would be more careful and thoughtful about things than the so-called "world's greatest deliberative body" the United States Senate!

Sarah is right, of course. She had been speaking out against START since Obama took office. She was one of the only ones who saw the dangers. As we all know, Sarah, as Governor of Alaska, had the care and feeding of America's missile defense system on her plate. She took the Obama regime on as they tried to gut that system. Some "comedians" make jokes about Sarah and Russia [which she's taken to embracing, just to tweak the libs] but the fact is, Alaska and Russia are incredibly close to one another. The Alaska Territory was actually part of Russia until it was purchased at the urging of Secretary of State William H. Seward in 1867.

The Alaska Air National Guard, of which Sarah Palin was Commander-in-Chief, routinely escorts Russian aircraft out of Alaskan air space. In fact, on Sarah's watch, the 176th Wing received the United States Air Force Outstanding Unit Award for, among other things, maintaining North American air sovereignty and prosecuting 22 Russian bomber intercepts. These would be the Tu-95 "Bear" bombers.



Sarah knows first hand the dangers the United States and our allies face on a daily basis. She also understands the real evil that exists in the world, while Obama and his ilk tend to assign a moral equivalency to it all.

We look around, and Sarah Palin is the only potential presidential candidate that is standing up and speaking out on foreign policy. She's the only one of the bunch who seems to get it. It's not for nothing that Greenfield places her alongside tough leaders like Ronald Reagan and George W Bush, who had solid foreign policy.

Reagan won the cold war without firing a shot. The Soviet Union went bankrupt as they tried to develop countermeasures for a defense project that only existed in Reagan's head!

As Greenfield pointed out, thanks to Bush's no nonsense policy, taking out the leadership in Afghanistan and Iraq, Libya's Khaddafi, a big sponsor of worldwide terror himself, was so afraid he was next, he gave up all of Libya's nuclear weapons without protest. This was the direct result of the U.S. invading both Afghanistan and Iraq.

So far the only thing Obama has managed, is weakening our own nuclear capability, while allowing rogue states like Iran and North Korea to run wild.

Thanks to Obama's lack luster ability, Iran is shipping nuclear capable medium-range missiles to Venezuela. Not only will this destabilize the entire region, these missiles are capable of reaching targets within the United States.

It's the Cuban Missile Crisis on steroids, and we have no indication that the Obama regime is even trying to stop this. Nukes in Venezuela, with a crazed dictator in charge, would be a disaster for the entire world. But Obama's golf game is improving, and really, isn't that all that matters?

Sarah Palin has the temperament, experience, and good old fashioned common sense that we as a nation need in a Commander-in-Chief. Under Obama's inept presidency, exactly like under Carter's, the world has become a much more dangerous place. We needed Ronald Reagan to take charge after Carter. He was the only logical choice for that time. Today we need Sarah Palin to take charge, as she is the only logical choice for our time.


read more...

Reuters: Americans Most Want Sandra Bullock, Sarah Palin As Neighbors





By Gary P Jackson

Online real estate marketer Zilliow.com surveyed American adults asking them who they would like to have living next door to them. As it turns out, Sandra Bullock and Sarah Palin topped the list coming in first and second respectively. The cast of Jersey Shore were voted "worst neighbors" in the polling.

From Reuters:

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Americans would most like to live next door to actress Sandra Bullock in 2011, but the cast of the reality show "Jersey Shore" made the most undesirable neighbors, according to a poll released on Tuesday.

Bullock, who has won huge audiences with her All-American, girl-next-door image, earned more than a quarter of the vote in the annual poll on the most desirable celebrity neighbors, conducted by online real estate marketplace Zillow.com.

She was followed by conservative Republican politician, Sarah Palin. That may bode well for people in Arizona as on Monday, headlines trumpeted the news that her daughter, Bristol Palin, had bought a home in the state.

President Barack Obama, his wife Michelle and daughters Malia and Sasha dropped three places to No. 4 on the list after coming out on top last year. They were proceeded by talk show hosts Ellen DeGeneres and wife Portia DeRossi at No. 3. Rounding out the top five was talk show host Conan O'Brien.

You can read more here.

This comes on the heels of Sarah Palin being named to Gallup's "Most Admired Woman" Top 10 for the third year in a row. For the ninth consecutive year, Hillary Clinton was chosen as the "Most Admired Woman" with Sarah Palin being chosen second for her third consecutive year in a row.

The Gallup poll asks those surveyed to choose both the most admired man and most admired woman living anywhere in the world.

You can see the full results of that polling here.
read more...

Obesity Policy Expert: Sarah Palin Is Right, Michelle Obama And Mike Huckabee Are Wrong




By Gary P Jackson

We've said this before, but get used to seeing "Sarah Palin was right and [fill in the blank] was wrong" a lot in the many years to come.

Though he comes at it from a different angle, the editors of National Review Online highlight prominent New York University obesity-policy scholar Rogan Kersh's take on the obesity issue. Our take is the First Lady and Huckabee are Big Government, Nanny State progressives who are a direct threat to personal Liberty and Freedom. Kersh comes at it from the medical angle and scientific angle.

From NRO:

One key ingredient in Sarah Palin’s political dynamite is the cheerful scorn with which she regards Washington, a small but zesty serving of which she recently dished up for First Lady Michelle Obama and her anti-obesity crusade. During an episode of her reality show, the once (and future?) candidate cooked up a mess of hot s’mores and a side of even hotter politics, declaring: “This is in honor of Michelle Obama, who said the other day we should not have dessert.

Palin was being over-generous in her paraphrase. What Mrs. Obama in fact said was considerably more worrisome: “We can’t just leave it up the parents.” Her particular target was unhealthful school lunches, which parents presumably require help from distant federal authorities to improve; it is clear from this and much else that the first lady envisions a very broad role for the federal government in menu planning. If her vision leaves any room for limitation on government interference in family affairs, it is impossible to detect it. Palin, responding specifically to this boundless license for federal meddling, later expanded on her views: “Instead of a government thinking that they need to take over and make decisions for us, according to some politician’s — or politician’s wife’s — priorities, just leave us alone, get off our back, and allow us, as individuals, to exercise our own God-given rights to make our own decisions.” (There is something particularly delicious in Palin’s tone when she pronounces the words “politician’s wife” — if there should be such a thing as a Palin administration, we are confident that the apparently easygoing Mr. Palin will not evolve into the first scold.)

As is the case with practically all things Palin, this latest statement has led to a predictable chorus of harrumphing nanny-staters, not every one of whom is obviously qualified to lecture the body politic on healthful eating. CNN’s fulsome Roland Martin declared Palin’s observation “so stupid that it defies logic,” and added that the former governor is too ignorant to “understand how devastating obesity is to the future of the United States.” Defying logic, Mr. Martin, along with practically all of Mrs. Palin’s critics on the issue, is missing a piece in his argument: specifically, even a smattering of evidence that busybody campaigns of the sort in which Mrs. Obama is engaged are likely to do more good than harm when it comes to extraordinarily complex issues such as obesity — which is indeed positioned to impose significant costs, both financial and human, on the American people.

The evidence is, in fact, to the contrary, suggesting that well-intentioned government policies will make the problem worse: To the extent that political action has thus far affected American obesity, it has been a thumb on the wrong side of the scales, subsidizing the worst kinds of foods through the farm-subsidy and school-lunch programs, and often giving out precisely the wrong kind of dietary advice.

Obesity is, in truth, among our least tractable public-health problems. It is an absolute Gordian knot of nutrition, behavior, genetics, child-rearing environments, hormonal biology, economics, and other factors too numerous and too subtle to catalog. As New York University obesity-policy scholar Rogan Kersh has noted, the problem “has proved impervious to clinical treatment or public-health exhortation,” and it is by no means clear what, if anything, public policy can accomplish, or what the best avenue for reform is, if indeed there is one. For an administration prone to smug castigation of its predecessors for their allegedly insufficient deference to scientific expertise, the Obama team is here shockingly cavalier about a scientific question of substantial depth and complexity. If Mrs. Obama, between her undergraduate major in sociology, her minor in African-American studies, and her law degree somehow managed also to acquire a great deal of expertise regarding a medical issue that has proved remarkably difficult for actual scholars and learned authorities, she has not seen fit to share how and where she acquired it.

Mrs. Obama’s “eat your veggies” crusade is at once a remarkably shallow response and a remarkably ambitious one: She may know next to nothing about the deeper issues, but she has adamant faith that the transformative quality of political power will allow even the most ignorant politician — or politician’s wife — to ameliorate any problem, even one that has thus far proved “impervious to clinical treatment.” By the same token, Mrs. Palin’s dismissal of that conceit contains more wisdom than is understood by political entrepreneurs of the Obama variety or by their factota in the media. Advantage: Palin.

First ladies have their causes, the general rule of which is that they do less damage the farther away from public policy they stay. If the Obama administration should happen to win the wars (and keep the won wars won) and balance the budget, head off the looming fiscal crisis, and present the American people with the head of Osama bin Laden, perhaps at that time it can get back to us about the broccoli. Until then, we have more of an appetite for Mrs. Palin’s healthy skepticism of governmental ambition than for Mrs. Obama’s overegged federal pudding: Washington has enough on its plate.

Dr Kersh is right, of course. Now granted there are lazy people who just eat too much and won't exercise, but for every one of those there are dozens who have real problems maintaining "approved weight." These issues are indeed complex. One can simply lose the genetic lottery, or there can be a combination of problems. Since science and medicine haven't found cures, it's reasonable to think no government intrusion in our lives can.

In the end, it all boils down to Freedom and Liberty. Of course, with Freedom and Liberty comes personal responsibility. This is something progressives can't tolerate. A free people, left to make their own decisions, good or bad, doesn't NEED government's help. That puts the progressives out of business, since their entire reason for living is telling others how to live their life. [No matter how poor of a job they have done living their own!]

The government already has problems fulfilling it constitutional requirements, only a fool would think having government take even MORE control of our lives will turn out well.
read more...

SarahPAC: "We Have Been Attacked"



Friends,

As many of you may already know, recently a network of Wikileaks-sympathizing hackers orchestrated crippling, albeit temporary, cyber-attacks on the websites of patriotic, law-abiding organizations around the country, including SarahPAC.com. It is widely believed that the same ad-hoc group of international cyber-criminals took down the websites of many organizations that terminated their business relationships with Wikileaks after their latest dump of compromising and classified US government information. These organizations include iconic American companies such as Visa and MasterCard as well as dotcom giants such as Amazon and Ebay's PayPal.

The actions taken by Wikileaks' supporters against these respected American companies show that their true intent is far from noble, and exposes their utter disregard for the collateral damage and financial fallout that resulted from their denial of service attacks. These reckless attacks on major transaction processors during the Christmas season added uncertainty to an already fragile economy and cost them money and resources that could have otherwise been used to grow their businesses and create new jobs.

These malicious hackers targeted major American companies simply for their refusal to participate in the degradation of America's ability to engage in diplomacy and the direct endangerment of our troops through the release of thousands of battlefield reports. Gov. Palin quickly and unapologetically spoke out against the illegal and irresponsible acts that Wikileaks explicitly exists to perpetrate. After her comments, SarahPAC.com immediately became another target for cyber-attack by Wikileaks' unofficial hacker-accomplices. In the name of defending free speech, the hackers, alleged to operate under the collective branding of 'Anonymous', decided to punish Gov. Palin for hers by flooding SarahPAC.com with a torrent of web traffic in order to make the website inaccessible to supporters.

The twisted logic of these self-styled advocates for free speech doesn't seem to differentiate between releasing millions of sensitive US government documents with the intent of degrading our nation's security and standing, and criticizing those who do so. Few times in our history have we, as a nation, faced so many security threats from such a varied and unpredictable array of rogue nations, terrorist organizations, and depraved individuals, and yet these self-styled 'hacktivists' are so committed to the continued release of our state secrets that they have decided to use their considerable 'talents' to punish those who dare speak out against the reckless endangerment of our republic through espionage.

SarahPAC was forced to spend some of our resources restoring functionality to our website and defending against future attacks, but we won't allow our commonsense conservative message to be silenced by a few malcontents. Please help us continue to support solid conservative candidates around the country by donating $50, $75, or $100 to SarahPAC.

The illegally obtained information contained within the State Department cable leaks is already damaging our diplomats' ability to advance American interests abroad and the Afghanistan and Iraq war document leaks represent a goldmine of intelligence for our most dangerous enemies to use against our troops on the battlefield. Please stand with SarahPAC against the reprehensible and downright dangerous acts of the Wikileaks organization and the cyber-intimidation of its misguided hacker allies.

Sincerely,

Tim Crawford
Treasurer
SarahPAC




Paid for by SarahPAC
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee www.SarahPAC.com

P.O. Box 7711
Arlington, VA 22207
read more...

ISP involved in Palin Email Hack Raided in FBI WikiLeaks Probe



The FBI raided the offices of 4Chan, an Internet Service Provider, which allegedly hosted anonymous accounts used in WikiLeaks "Operation Payback" attacks against Governor Palin, among several other targets, The Smoking Gun today reported. 4chan also was involved in the 2008 hacking of Gov. Palin's private email accounts.
The FBI investigation began earlier this month after PayPal officials contacted agents and “reported that an Internet activist group using the names ‘4chan’ and “Anonymous” appeared to be organizing a distributed denial of service (“DDoS”) attack against the company,” according to an FBI affidavit excerpted here.

The PayPal assault was part of “Operation Payback,” an organized effort to attack firms that suspended or froze WikiLeaks’s accounts in the wake of the group’s publication of thousands of sensitive Department of State cables. As noted by the FBI, other targets of this “Anonymous” effort included Visa, Mastercard, Sarah Palin’s web site, and the Swedish prosecutor pursuing sex assault charges against Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder.

On December 9, PayPal investigators provided FBI agents with eight IP addresses that were hosting an “Anonymous” Internet Relay Chat (IRC) site that was being used to organize denial of service attacks. The unidentified administrators of this IRC “then acted as the command and control” of a botnet army of computers that was used to attack target web sites.
The Smoking Gun's source document pertaining to the DDOS attack on PayPal can be viewed here.

US District Court Denies Subpoena of Gov. Palin's Emails references 4chan's involvement in hacking her email accounts. The "anonymous" account hosted by 4chan may or may not have been involved with the attacks on SarahPAC, Conservatives4Palin, Organize4Palin, PalinTV, and Tammy Bruce.

Yesterday, US 4 Palin started a Money Bomb to help SarahPAC recover 2011 campaign funds it had to use to repair its site and secure it against further DDOS attacks.
read more...

Governor Palin's Top 10 Policy and Political Statements of 2010

As it is the last week of 2010, in lieu of a "Governor Palin on the Issues" post this week, I'd like to compile a list of Governor Palin's Top 10 Policy and Political Statements of 2010. You can find the first two "Governor Palin on the Issues" posts on monetary policy here and on entitlement programs here. Perhaps this can serve as an easily digestible version of some of Governor Palin's policy stances for Charles Krauthammer, Dana Perino, Peggy Noonan and other Republicans ostriches who have willfully had their heads in the sands for the past two plus years. Through Facebook, op-eds that have appeared in the Wall Street Journal and National Review among others publications, and speeches, Governor Palin has weighed in on many of the important policy issues facing America today. She has also been the most bold conservative voice in America--challenging Republicans to stand firmly on the planks of the Republican party. There are, of course, more than ten policy and politically focused areas Governor Palin has taken a stand on this year, but it is my hope that this will serve as a summary. The selection of these particular ten statements are merely the opinion of one ordinary barbarian. They are listed by title and are in no particular order.

1) The Midterms: Lessons Learned and the Way Forward
Following the 2010 Midterm elections, Governor Palin penned a piece at the National Review entitled "The Midterms: Lessons Learned and the Way Forward". In this piece, Governor Palin provided 4 lessons that Republicans can learn:1) set the narrative 2) fight back the lies immediately and consistently 3) get out the mother of all GOTV efforts in 2012 and 4) a winning conservative message must always be carefully crafted. Here is an excerpt from this excellent piece:
The last, and possibly most important, lesson is that a winning conservative message must always be carefully crafted. If candidates are going to talk boldly on the campaign trail about entitlement reform and reducing the size of government, they must be prepared to word it in such a way as to minimize the inevitable fear-mongering accusations of “extremism.” We are quickly approaching a fiscal turning point where these crucial reform discussions will be mandatory. We need to speak about them in a way that the public will embrace. During his first run for the presidency in 1976, Ronald Reagan found out that election campaigns aren’t necessarily the best settings for quasi-academic discussions about issues like Social Security reform. So for his next campaign, he resolved to build his platform out of tried and tested policies like tax cuts. Successful candidates in the next election cycle will have to test and develop similar policy platforms that address the crucial issues of entitlement reform and shrinking government in a way that the voters will find pragmatic and even attractive.

2) Why I support the Ryan Roadmap
A few weeks ago, Governor Palin wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal expressing her support for Congressman Ryan's Roadmap to lead to a more financially stable nation through entitlement reforms, tax cuts, and spending cuts. Here is an excerpt:
Put simply: Our country is on the path toward bankruptcy. We must turn around before it's too late, and the Roadmap offers a clear plan for doing so. But it does more than just fend off disaster. CBO calculations show that the Roadmap would also help create a "much more favorable macroeconomic outlook" for the next half-century. The CBO estimates that under the Roadmap, by 2058 per-person GDP would be around 70% higher than the current trend.

Is Rep. Ryan's Roadmap perfect? Of course not—no government plan ever is. But it's the best plan on the table at a time when doing nothing is no longer an option.

Let's not settle for the big-government status quo, which is what the president's commission offers. We owe it to our children and grandchildren to make these tough decisions so that they might inherit a prosperous and strong America like the one we were given.
3)Peace Through Strength and American Pride vs. "Enemy Centric Policy"
In June, Governor Palin gave a speech at Freedom Fest in Virginia where she spent a large portion of her time speaking critically of President Obama's foreign policy and his disdain for American exceptionalism. She later provided excerpts of this speech on her Facebook page. Here is a small part of that speech:
It’s not the only area where the Obama administration has failed our allies. They escalated a minor zoning issue in Jerusalem into a major dispute with our most important ally in the Middle East, Israel. They treated the Israeli Prime Minister shabbily in Washington. When a Turkish sponsored flotilla threatened to violate a legal Israeli blockade of Hamas-run Gaza, the Obama Administration was silent. When Israeli commandos were assaulted as they sought to prevent unmonitored cargoes from being delivered to Hamas terrorists, the Obama Administration sent signals it might allow a UN investigation into the matter – an investigation that would be sure to condemn our ally Israel and bemoan the plight of Hamas. Loyal NATO allies in central Europe were undermined by the cancellation of a missile defense program with virtually no warning. At the same time, Russia and China are given preferential treatment, while remaining silent on their human rights violations.
4)Bailouts Reward Bad Behavior
During her time as Governor, Governor Palin managed Alaska with such fiscal prudence that nearly bankrupt states like California, New York, Illinois, and Michigan would do well to study and learn from her how to budget and spend appropriately. She wrote a Facebook post highlighting what she did as Governor to help put Alaska on strong financial ground, and she suggests that struggling states who may seek a federal bailout to do the same. Here is a small part of the post:
It’s one thing to veto spending and reduce the size of government when your state is broke. I did it when my state was flush with revenue from a surplus – though I had to fight politicians who wanted to spend like there was no tomorrow. It’s not easy to tell people no and make them act fiscally responsible and cut spending when the money is rolling in and your state is only 50 years shy of being a territory and everyone is yelling at you to spend while the money is there to build. My point is, if I could fight this fight in Alaska at a time of surplus, then other governors can and should be able to do the same at a time when their states are facing bankruptcy and postponing this fight is no longer an option.

So, let’s not continue to reward irresponsible political behavior. Instead of handing out more federal dollars, let’s give the governors of these debt-ridden states some free advice. Shake off the pressure from public sector unions to cave on this issue. Put up with the full page newspaper attack ads, the hate-filled rhetoric, and the other union strong arm tactics that I, too, had to put up with while fighting those who don’t believe a state needs to live within its means. Stand up to the special interests that are bankrupting your states. You may not be elected Miss Congeniality for fighting to get your fiscal houses in order; but in the long run, the people who hired you to do the right thing will appreciate your prudence and fiscal conservatism.
5) Passing the Buck Doesn't "Plug the D#*! Hole"
Governor Palin was pointedly critical of the Obama administration's mismanagement of the oil spill in the Gulf this past Spring. As a governor of an energy producing state and as a former oil and gas commissioner, Governor Palin's opinion is particularly relevant. In May, Governor Palin posted a note on Facebook regarding this topic. Here is an excerpt:
The 1990 Oil Pollution Act was drafted in response to the Exxon-Valdez spill in my home state. It created new procedures for offshore cleanups, specifically putting the federal government in charge of such operations. The President should have used the authority granted by the OPA – immediately – to take control of the situation. That is a big part of what the OPA is for – to designate who is in charge so finger-pointing won’t disrupt efforts to just “plug the d#*! hole.” But instead of immediately engaging with this crisis, our President chose to spend precious time on political pet causes like haranguing the state of Arizona for doing what he himself was supposed to do – secure the nation’s border. He also spent much time fundraising and politicking for liberal candidates and causes while we waited for him to grasp the enormity of the Gulf spill.
6) Lies, Damned Lies-Obamacare 6 Months Later; It's Time to Take Back the 20!
In September, six months following the passage of Obamacare, Governor Palin coupled endorsements of 20 candidates up against Democrats who voted for Obamacare with a scathing rundown of all the ills of Obamacare. In November, 18 of these districts represented by Obamacare supporting Democrats elected conservatives to fill those seats. Here is a brief excerpt from that Facebook post:
So, yes, those rationing “death panels” are there, and so are the tax increases that the president also promised were “absolutely not” in his bill. (Aren’t you tiring of the untruths coming from this White House and the liberals in Congress?) When the state of Florida filed a challenge to Obamacare on the basis that the mandates in the bill are unconstitutional, the Obama Department of Justice filed a motion to dismiss the suit by citing the Anti-Injunction Act, which blocks courts from interfering with the federal government’s ability to collect taxes. Yes, taxes! Once the bill was passed it was no longer politically inconvenient for the Obama administration to admit that it makes no difference whether the payment is a tax or a penalty because it’s “assessed and collected in the same manner.” The National Taxpayer Advocate has already warned that “Congress must provide sufficient funding” to allow the IRS to collect this new tax. Pretty soon we’ll be paying taxes just to make it possible for the IRS to collect all the additional taxes under Obamacare! Seems as if this is another surprise that the public found out about after the bill was rammed through.
7) Senate Republicans: Vote No on New START
Governor Palin wrote a piece for the National Review earlier this month outlining why the Senate should not ratify the START treaty with Russia. Many supporters of the treaty tried to claim that President Reagan would have supported the treaty, as one of his goals was reduction of nuclear arms. However, as Governor Palin points out, President Reagan increased not decreased missile defense as President Obama has done:
New START recognizes a link between offensive and defensive weapons – a position the Russians have sought for years. Russia claims the treaty constrains U.S. missile defenses and that they will withdraw from the treaty if we pursue missile defenses. This linkage virtually guarantees that either we limit our missile defenses or the Russians will withdraw from the treaty. The Obama administration claims that this is not the case; but if that is true, why agree to linking offensive and defensive weapons in the treaty? At the height of the Cold War, President Reagan pursued missile defense while also pursuing verifiable arms control with the then-Soviet Union. That position was right in the 1980’s, and it is still right today. We cannot and must not give up the right to missile defense to protect our population – whether the missiles that threaten us come from Russia, Iran, China, North Korea, or anywhere else. I fought the Obama administration’s plans to cut funds for missile defense in Alaska while I was Governor, and I will continue to speak out for missile defenses that will protect our people and our allies.
8 ) An Open Letter to Republican Freshman Members of Congress
In mid November, Governor Palin wrote an open letter to new Congressmen and women challenging them remain true to the principles they ran on and to remember that they are accountable to the voters. In this, Governor Palin also gave a great summary of her stances on the issues of Obamacare, spending, taxes, entitlement reforms, Israel, Iraq, Afghanistan, the START treaty, and border security among other issues. Here is a small excerpt:

You’ve also got to be deadly serious about cutting the deficit. Despite what some would like us to believe, tax cuts didn’t get us into the mess we’re in. Government spending did. Tough decisions need to be made about reducing government spending. The longer we put them off, the worse it will get. We need to start by cutting non-essential spending. That includes stopping earmarks (because abuse of the earmark process created the "gateway-drug" that allowed backroom deals and bloated budgets), canceling all further spending on the failed Stimulus program, and rolling back non-discretionary spending to 2008 levels. You can do more, but this would be a good start.

9)Domestic Drilling: Why We Can Still Believe
Governor Palin's forte has always been energy. As a wife of a former oil field worker, an Oil and Gas Commissioner, and Governor of Alaska, she has the perfect expertise to speak to how energy independence provides jobs and helps secure our nation. She also provides the perfect antithesis to President Obama's overregulation. Governor Palin is a firm supporter of industry oversight rather than industry regulation. This approach holds energy companies accountable to the people while giving them the freedom to produce and provide jobs. Following the Gulf oil spill, Governor Palin offered her continued support for drilling for oil to fuel America:
All responsible energy development must be accompanied by strict oversight, but even with the strictest oversight in the world, accidents still happen. No human endeavor is ever without risk – whether it’s sending a man to the moon or extracting the necessary resources to fuel our civilization. I repeat the slogan “drill here, drill now” not out of naiveté or disregard for the tragic consequences of oil spills – my family and my state and I know firsthand those consequences. How could I still believe in drilling America’s domestic supply of energy after having seen the devastation of the Exxon-Valdez spill? I continue to believe in it because increased domestic oil production will make us a more secure, prosperous, and peaceful nation.
10) Palin to Bernanke:' Cease and Desist'
Governor Palin warned of the hazardous effects of the second round of quantitative easing by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke. Printing money will inevitably lead to inflation and other effects that will not help an already severely hurting economy. The National Review Online published some of her remarks on this from a November speech in Arizona. Here is part of that excerpt:
We shouldn’t be playing around with inflation. It’s not for nothing Reagan called it “as violent as a mugger, as frightening as an armed robber, and as deadly as a hit man.” The Fed’s pump priming addiction has got our small businesses running scared, and our allies worried. The German finance minister called the Fed’s proposals “clueless.” When Germany, a country that knows a thing or two about the dangers of inflation, warns us to think again, maybe it’s time for Chairman Bernanke to cease and desist. We don’t want temporary, artificial economic growth bought at the expense of permanently higher inflation which will erode the value of our incomes and our savings. We want a stable dollar combined with real economic reform. It’s the only way we can get our economy back on the right track.
Governor Palin wrote numerous Facebook posts and op-eds on a variety of subjects in 2010. This list only provides a small taste. In addition to what was listed Governor Palin wrote about the Bush tax cuts, border security, Afghanistan, Iraq, and the mosque at Ground Zero, among others. Many of these posts were endorsements of candidates who received a great boost from her support. Her 140 character tweets even spoke volumes. In 2010, Governor Palin spoke at various industry conferences, campaign rallies, pro-life events, conservative conferences, and the like. Not too shabby for someone whom, according the Elites, isn't serious about policy; wouldn't you say?

Have a blessed new year, everyone! While many of Americans will be eating black eyed peas to ring in the new year, I hope that the elites acquire a taste for a steady diet of crow in 2011.They'll certainly being eating quite a bit of it in the coming year.
read more...

Tammy Bruce Shoots Down Intellectual and Authenticity Memes


Tammy Bruce shot down Juan Williams' meme that Gov. Palin is "not on the same intellectual stage" as Obama, and an Alinksy-esque meme being circulated that Gov Palin is less than authentic. Williams had been fired from NPR for a "politically incorrect" statement he made about Muslims. Gov. Palin defended his right to free speech. Fox News subsequently hired him.


Tammy Bruce Answers Juan Williams – Palin Not on the Same Intellectual Stage as Obama retrieved from PalinTV.


Tammy Bruce on Dana Perino – Palin Not Authentic? retrieved from PalinTV

read more...

Miller Considering Next Legal Steps

Joe Miller said in a press release sent overnight that his legal team believes that the Elections Clause and precedent support their legal claims and they are considering their next legal steps. The next most likely legal step for the Tea Party conservative would be an appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is the most liberal Appeals Court Circuit in the nation. There, his team would have to argue before three judges that Judge Beistline committed an error of law or made judicial errors in his ruling. Because only .01% of cases brought before the US Supreme Court are granted Certiorari, odds are 99.99% that the ruling from a Circuit Court appeal would be the final one.

"I am disappointed with the federal court's ruling today. The U.S. Constitution's Elections Clause presented the most significant constitutional issue. Specifically, should the courts be required to follow the legislature's standard for the selection of U.S. Senators or create their own? My legal team believes that the clear language of the Election Clause as well as precedent support our claims. Thus, we are evaluating the ruling and determining what our next step should be."

Complete Transcript: US District Court, District of Alaska: Miller v. Lieut. Gov. Mead Treadwell, in his Official Capacity, and State of Alaska, Division of Elections
read more...

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Money Bomb: Help SarahPAC Recover from Cyber-Terrorist Attack

Ed. Note: This Money Bomb is a grassroots effort to help SarahPAC recover the costs associated with repairing the SarahPAC site and securing it against future attacks. SarahPAC has neither reviewed nor authorized this Money Bomb. Sites referenced other than SarahPAC are not operated or authorized by Gov. Palin, her staff, SarahPAC or any other campaign or committee.


Urgent Fund-Raising Request

SarahPAC mailed supporters an urgent fund-raising request which documented how Governor Palin, her family, and SarahPAC, were attacked earlier this month by cyber-terrorists. SarahPAC had to use funds intended for 2011 campaigning to repair its website and secure it against further attacks. Conservatives4Palin, Organize4Palin, PalinTV, and Tammy Bruce were subsequently attacked and the administrators of these respective privately owned and operated sites had to pay significant costs to get them back up and running.

Supporters of Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks conducted Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) attacks against the aforementioned websites and hacked into the personal credit card accounts of Governor Palin and her husband Todd. The attacks were made in a retaliation campaign called "Operation Payback" for her posting of Serious Questions about the Obama Administration's Incompetence in the Wikileaks Fiasco. In that Facebook Note, Gov. Palin asked, "Why was Julian Assange not pursued with the same urgency we pursue Al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?"

Sick Un-American Espionage Efforts

Indeed, Gov. Palin spoke out against "Assange's sick un-American espionage efforts" and brought to light an issue the Obama administration has remained remarkably silent on. Since the past summer, Assange and his WikiLeaks band of cyber-terrorists among other things:
  • "Posted Classified US Documents on the Internet - which has put our national security and US soldiers at risk."
  • "In addition to other dangerous leaks, Assange's postings revealed the identity of more than 100 Afghan informants to enemies in the Taliban. Now their lives are at risk - and the US has lost valuable sources of information."
Governor Palin rightly wrote in the WikiLeaks Fiasco Note that Assange is "an anti-American operative with blood on his hands." The Obama administration never even labeled Assange what he is: a serious threat to national security. Governor Palin had the courage to address this issue. The Palin family, SarahPAC, and our treasured colleagues took the heat. SarahPAC needs our help to be made whole and recover costs incurred from this attack.

Help Elect Common-Sense Conservatives who Will Root Out Terrorists

SarahPAC can then resume its mission: "electing common-sense conservatives to Congress and crucial state seats...

...conservatives who will make it a priority to root out terrorists and the nations that harbor them."

Please click the SarahPAC graphic to donate as generously as you can afford.


Donate to SarahPAC
read more...

Federal Trial Court Dismisses Miller's Election Case

US Senate Candidate Joe Miller's federal court case alleging violations of the Election and Equal Protection clauses of the US Constitution was dismissed today, according to an Anchorage Daily News report. Judge Beistline dismissed Millers' case entirely before the State of Alaska even responded. The state's response was due tomorrow, December 29. In dismissing the case, the judge lifted the injunction he had placed on the state against certifying Sen. Lisa Murkowski, the incumbent as the winner.

In the federal court system, a case may only be appealed a Circuit Court of Appeals on the grounds of judicial error committed by the trial court (US District Courts) judge. Both sides in a appeal have three minutes to present oral arguments. Appeals are generally heard by a panel of three judges; however, in rare cases they may be heard en banc - that is all active judges for whichever one of the 13 Circuit Courts of Appeals has jurisdiction over a case. The final stop in the appeals process is the US Supreme Court which hears cases only after granting a Writ of Certiorari. The US Supreme Court grants Certiorari only to a fraction of the cases brought before it - roughly 100 out of 10,000 or .01%, making the Circuit Court of Appeals the final arbiter in 99.9% of the cases.

Joe Miller, therefore, must be able to argue an error of law on Judge Beistline's part to have basis for an appeal. Should he be able to argue this, The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals which has jurisdiction over Alaska would hear the case. If Miller has no legal basis for an appeal, his entire electoral journey likely has reached its conclusion today.

Complete Transcript: US District Court, District of Alaska: Miller v. Lieut. Gov. Mead Treadwell, in his Official Capacity, and State of Alaska, Division of Elections
read more...

Monday, December 27, 2010

Bristol Palin's Son Tripp Turns Two Today



Happy Second Birthday, Tripp.

A lot has happened in Tripp's two years, but most especially the last six months. He's seen his mother Dance with the Stars and starred along with his mother and grandmother in Sarah Palin's Alaska. The staff at US for Palin wish Tripp a life filled with happiness, love, and prosperity.
read more...

Miller to Continue Case in Federal Court

The Anchorage Daily News and the Miller campaign both reported overnight that US Senate Candidate Joe Miller will continue his case in federal court arguing on the US Constitution's Election and Equal Protection clauses. Miller, however, is withdrawing his motion, which led to the federal injunction on the State of Alaska certifying the election. The withdrawal, or the judge's lifting of the injunction irrespective of Miller's actions means that Sen. Murkowski will be seated in the next Congress and retain her seniority on committees.

Judge Beistline will rule from the filing of both Joe Miller and the State of Alaska, so there will not be any oral arguments made by either side. Miller first filed his suit in federal court, but Judge Beistline directed him to file in the state court system. Miller lost his case at the Superior (trial) court and the state Supreme Court unanimously upheld the Superior Court's ruling.

From the US District Court, where Miller's federal case resides, the next stop is a Circuit Court of Appeals proceeding, and the final stop is the US Supreme Court which may or may not grant Certiorari to hear the case, assuming Miller pursues the case beyond the federal trial level.

Constitutional Arguments
In its court filings, the Miller legal team pointed out several issues that require further review including: whether the U.S. Constitution’s Election Clause was violated by ignoring the legislature’s mandatory provisions for write-in candidates; whether the U.S. Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause was violated by the different vote counting standards that were applied, dependent on the candidate in question; and other issues such as at least hundreds of felons voting and at least hundreds of ballots being filled out by a handful of people.
read more...

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Juan Williams, Exit Stage Left!

Yet another one of Governor Palin's Fox News colleagues attempted to perpetuate the "dumb" meme regarding Governor Palin. Appearing on Fox News Sunday today, Juan Williams stated:
There's nobody out there, except for Sarah Palin, who can absolutely dominate the stage, and she can't stand on the intellectual stage with Obama.

After all, according to Williams, Governor Palin is nothing but a centerfold for conservative men, right? What should we expect? How in the world could a state college educated female and former journalist carry a candle to a Ivy League educated male president?

However, perhaps this time Williams is right. Governor Palin and President Obama can't stand on the same stage. A couple of weeks ago, I wrote a post describing the difference between Governor Palin's intelligence and President Obama's intellectualism:
The critics of Governor Palin’s intelligence miss the distinct difference between intelligence and intellectualism. Intelligence involves the ability to process and apply information in a successful manner. By comparison, Thomas Sowell, an esteemed economist, author, and favorite of Governor Palin’s, describes intellectualism: “at the core of the notion of an intellectual is the dealer in ideas, as such–not the personal application of ideas”. In 2009, Sowell wrote a book entitled Intellectuals and Society where he highlights how the role of “intellectuals” have negatively influenced all aspects of society–from economics to law to the media. The common thread that runs through each aspect that Sowell covers in his book is that intellectuals feel that they are needed to dictate to the unwashed masses how they should conduct their lives. This is where you get the intellectual politicians who feel that they should control the economy through regulations, taxation, and the like, and this is also where you get the pontificating pundits who feel that they know best. After all, they have the Ivy League education and the self-declared credentials to do so, right?

In just under 2 years as president, Obama has ushered in the government takeover of the healthcare, college loan, banking, and internet industries, in addition to extending the extensive government involvement in the auto industry that he supported during President Bush's administration. President Obama has given further regulatory control to unelected agencies like the EPA, FCC, and FDA. He has added more to the national deficit in 2 years than his predecessors did in more than 200 years. His stimulus package led to over 10% unemployment, when it was promised to prevent unemployment from going over 8%. President Obama kowtowed (or as I like to call it, bowtowed) to both America's enemies and union bosses. He pushed for a treaty with Russia that allows Russia to continue to produce nuclear weapons while America must halt weapon production; all the while reducing funding for missile defense. He mishandled America's most destructive environmental disaster in history by blaming the previous administration for his own appointees' failures. He is joined with foreign nations in suing the state of Arizona for desiring to enforce federal border security and immigration laws.

As Governor, Sarah Palin put $5 billion in state savings and decreased state spending by more than 9%. She reduced earmark requests by 80%. She stands for smaller government and reduced intervention by unelected, appointed bureaucrats. She stood firmly against the stimulus package and called for President Obama to veto the bill. She stood against cuts to missile defense and called for the Senate to not verify the START treaty. She called for the President to turn away from his "enemy centric" foreign policy. She stood for oversight of the oil industry and federal responsibility in cleaning up the oil spill, rather than burdensome, job killing regulations and drilling moratoriums. She stood with Governor Brewer in a desire to secure the border.

Governor Palin has private sector experience as a journalist, fisherwoman, and small business owner in addition to nearly twenty years of political experience between the city council, mayor's office, Oil and Gas Regulator, and Governor. President Obama has experience as a community organizer, state senator, and US Senator. By the time President Obama was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Governor Palin already had three times as much executive experience as President Obama currently has. She has had to balance a budget as a small business owner and a governor, and she has understood the importance of handling both prudently and responsibility. President Obama established a deficit commission after he signed legislation that added more than a trillion dollars to the deficit--willfully oblivious to the effects of his lack of executive experience.

If you juxtapose President Obama's experience, policies, and record against Governor Palin's experience, stances and record, then I suppose Williams is right. Governor Palin cannot stand on the "intellectual" stage with Obama, and rightfully so. While President Obama' s supposed intellect has made us a less secure nation in every sense of the word, Governor Palin's gubernatorial record and stances would lead America to a more financial stable and a more secure nation.

Governor Palin stands on the stage of common sense, practicality, and smart governance. Juan Williams and President Obama can exit stage left.
read more...

Why Bristol's Maricopa, AZ Home Buy Could be Significant to 2012



News that Bristol Palin bought a house for $172,000 cash in Maricopa, Arizona broke Friday and spread like wildfire throughout the day, continuing well into yesterday. US for Palin did not carry the story at first, because we were not satisfied that it was true. So much of what is "reported" on Bristol is outright lies. But this one was different. I first saw it in the Maricopa Monitor. The managing editor, Brett Fera, cited county records. Two local Fox affiliates picked it up. Fox News picked it up. Yesterday, the story flashed by on the ticker just outside Rockefeller Center as my wife and I walked the area partaking in Christmas festivities. These factors, plus a phone call I made to a source familiar with the Palins satisfied me that the story is true.

Size

Five Bedrooms and nearly 4,000 square feet is a lot of house for a single mom and her baby. It's the perfect size for said single mom, her baby, parents, siblings, grandparents, and other members of the extended family to visit. It's the perfect size to be used for a Lower 48 base of operations.

Family Connections

The Palins have family connections to Arizona (and Washington State and Texas) that date back over 40 years.

Political Connections

The McCains are not too far away. Congressman Gosar is very close too....Gov. Palin endorsed him for the 2010 election, but the significance of Rep. Gosar goes way beyond the endorsement win.

A Key Member of Gov. Palin's Kitchen Cabinet Moved to Arizona's First Congressional District

Political reported earlier in the week that Thomas Van Flein accepted the position of legislative director and deputy chief of staff for incoming Republican Rep. Paul Gosar. Congressman Gosar represents Arizona's massive First Congressional District located north and east of Phoenix and Maricopa.


Click map to open full-size in separate tab or window. Maricopa is annotated with a red oval. The First Congressional District is indicated in purple highlight.

Time Magazine ran a list of Gov. Palin's Inner Circle, Kitchen Cabinet, Outer Circle, and the second concentric ring out. Thomas Van Flein is squarely in Gov. Palin's Kitchen Cabinet. He is her lawyer and political adviser and nothing has changed in that regard. Most of the people associated with Gov. Palin from Inner Circle to second outer ring worked for either President Bush or Senator McCain.

From the foregoing we see that Van Flein's move to Representative Gosar's district and Bristol Palin's move to Maricopa are not coincidences, accidents or facts of happenstance. Instead, we see a well-planned sequence of chess moves executed by a certain woman who has nearly 20 years of political experience.

Geography

Wasilla is as far from New York and Washington as Warsaw, Poland plus another 200 miles. Travel to and from Alaska is very expensive, time consuming and physically wearing. While Phoenix is not centrally located, it is the nearest major city to Maricopa and four hours flight time from the farthest points of the continental United States. From Phoenix, Gov. Palin could fly to Los Angeles San Francisco, or Seattle, which are gateways to Alaska and the Pacific Rim. A flight to Houston, Chicago, New York, Washington, or Miami is easy. These cities are gateways to points throughout the United States and the rest of the world. Maricopa is bracketed by Interstate 10 to the north and east, and Interstate 8 to the south. Interstate 17 continues north where 10 takes its westward turn toward California.

SarahWaveReaganSalute
read more...

Saturday, December 25, 2010

Gov Palin Delivers Christmas Message to Troops


Governor Palin today demonstrated Presidential Leadership when she wished our troops a Merry Christmas and said our military "is a force for good" in a segment recorded on Fox and Friends.


Gov. Palin’s Christmas Message to Troops retrieved from: PalinTV.

H/T OP Ditch, Vets 4 Sarah for story lead.

read more...

A Merry Christmas from Patrick’s World USA


It’s great to be here in sunny Florida with my mom, sister and nephew. My son will join me here tomorrow for the week. It’s an opportunity to be joyful for being with one’s family. It is also an opportunity to say hello and be thankful for all my friends. So from the Reaganesque land of Patrick’s World USA where Sarah Palin has taken the reigns of leadership from our dearly departed Ronnie, I wish all of you who read my blog and follow me on Twitter a special, blessed and Merry Christmas.

It’s important that we all send out Christmas greetings to all the patriots who fight to return our country to its Constitutional roots – a restoration that will bring us back to what our Founders had envisioned for the future of our country and the role of government. We are a strong group of people. We have taken time from our lives to write, volunteer and support strong commonsense conservatives in their quests for public office knowing that they are running not to obtain seats of power from which to personally benefit, but to obtain seats of power from which they could serve us, the people who make this great nation shine.

The idea that people would want to go to Washington with a “servants heart” is foreign to arrogant liberals, intellectuals and establishment types who see their leadership positions as perches from which they can look down on the little people and dictate to us what they think is in our best interest. In November, we began to turn that tide when we voted to return the House of Representatives to the Republicans and closed the gap in the Senate. This is merely a first step.

As we set our eyes on 2012, we will again be assessing the performances of our Congressional representatives. In other words, we’re making a list and checking it twice. We’re going to find out who’s naughty or nice so that in 2012, when Sarah Palin comes to town, those who sweep in on her coattails can plug some of the holes that are still there following the 2010 midterms.

We see you when you’re voting for DADT, START and the Food Safety Bill. We know when you’re awake (when you stand firm on de-funding Obamacare and writing a budget that is fiscally sound). Earmarks will only lead to coal in 2012’s political stocking. So you better be good for goodness sake. I’m talking Jim Demint and Michele Bachmann good.

And of course, we wish Sarah Palin and her family a merry Christmas. We know they will be looking at the biggest decision their family has ever had to make going into the new year. We pray that their prayers are answered and that they are given the Divine inspiration that they will need in order to make a decision that will best serve our country. And should Sarah decide to run, we need to not only pledge ourselves to the cause, we must also convince others that if we all stand together, united, that we can break the deadly grip that liberalism and progressivism has on our country.

I’m just beginning to make a Christmas list which won’t be turned in until next year. It’s a tall order, but one that miracles on 34th Street are made of. Someday we will prove that what we are saying is right.

There was a time when the tax system and monetary policy of our country allowed for wealth to flow as production was incentivized and incomes rose in proportion to one’s contribution to the economic engine’s growth. It was a long time ago when Ronald Reagan stood beneath a refurbished Statue of Liberty to celebrate our nation’s independence during a time of great abundance.

It’s time to refurbish again so that Sarah Palin can stand in the restored honor of a great nation and celebrate a phoenix’s rise from the ashes.

Merry Christmas and God bless you all.
read more...